[VadeRetro]

Here's what I said to you in 801.

What does evolution say about the possibility of teats on a dinosaur and why does it say it? After all, you know that what it says is wrong, so you must know what it says and why it says it.

When you say this

You just make bald assertions and throw dirt on the wall hoping no one will call you on it. Well I am calling you on it Vade. Give the proof.

does that mean, "OK, I give up? I can't imagine what evolution says on the subject or why it would say it?"

Sure you want to do that? How can you put down evolution if you have no idea how it works?

There's a line of evolutionary reasoning which says "No" to mammaries on dinosaurs.

I say this even though I've often shown you a figure of reptilian skulls almost morphing into early mammal skulls, so obvious is the relationship.

Big, big hint: None of those reptiles were dinosaurs.

[gore3000]

In post#680 you said:

"gore3000 has said that, for all the fossil record shows, dinosaurs might have had mammary glands. Indeed, for all that ID/creationism says, they might have. Evolution, which has real information content, tells us that they did not.

I asked you to back it up several times, you have yet to do so. Give the proof and stop the nonsense. You cannot give proof so you evade and try to make me the issue.