I was pointing out a logical fallacy not introducing evidence. But to answer your question, you tell me how to reproduce personal experience and I'll see about it. As I've said before, anecdotal evidence is unverifiable, ergo, unacceptable.
And as I've said before, it is the best evidence for the person who experiences it.
OTOH, I do recommend reading Paul Davies and several other authors of that ilk. I'm up enough on science to understand what they write; I'm not up enough to be able to argue it with any particularly detail or clarity.
But to clarify above, I wasn't saying that there was necessarily evidence. I simply asserting that evidence and faith are not mutually exclusive.