Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Skwor

I’m not talking about any of that.

Having a child at the expense of the deaths of other children is an absolute evil; no matter how healthy of lifestyle the mother lives.

Struggling sinners, like you, need not promote and defend the deliberate death of unborn children.


39 posted on 08/08/2024 4:59:20 PM PDT by ebb tide ("The Spirit of Vatican II" is nothing more than a wicked "idealogy" of the modernists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: ebb tide

You are dodging the moral issue completely, either a less than perfect “mother to be” is just as guilty of murder if their actions cause a miscarriage, just as much as an IVF pregnancy or neither are.

I am only stating it is not so morally clear and we have an imperfect understanding, you are making the case for, and in your words “absolute evil” I find it strange you balk at living up to that same standard in all situations then.

Jesus refused to condemn an adulteress when the law clearly stated it was warranted, Jesus was absolutely correct for not applying the law as such, maybe consider why? And it is not just because He is God and has a special exception, that is an immature understanding. I find it unsettling how easily some toss around such absolute moral judgements for nearly all issues.


42 posted on 08/08/2024 5:15:16 PM PDT by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Your definition of IDF is flawed no matter how fervently you present it. Many couples have only one embryo implanted because they would not be willing in any circumstance to selectively terminate.


49 posted on 08/08/2024 5:57:43 PM PDT by JayGalt (Fight! Fight! Fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson