Working both ends against the middle.
How can they justify something they deny happened?
If they try to justify it, it’s a tacit admission that it happened, therefore they can’t then logically deny it.
You're overthinking it.
You can deny falsehoods and myths ABOUT a historical event (or a historical institution) without denying the existence of said event or institution.
Quote:
Working both ends against the middle.
How can they justify something they deny happened?
If they try to justify it, it’s a tacit admission that it happened, therefore they can’t then logically deny it.
/\ /\ /\ THAT /\ /\ /\