Posted on 05/20/2024 7:30:03 AM PDT by ebb tide
Diocesan hermits by nature don’t get much attention. A small subset of religious persons, hermits mostly spend their lives engaged in quiet prayer.
Brother Christian Matson, a Catholic diocesan hermit in Kentucky, has spent years doing just that. His monk’s habit might catch his neighbors’ eye, but he is known in the town where he lives primarily through his work with the local theater.
But recently Matson decided that his faith compels him to make a little more noise than usual.
“This Sunday, Pentecost 2024, I’m planning to come out publicly as transgender,” Matson told Religion News Service on Friday (May 17), saying he was speaking out with the permission of his bishop, John Stowe of the Diocese of Lexington in Kentucky.
Matson, who is also a Benedictine oblate, believes he is the first openly transgender person in his position in the Catholic Church. It is a difficult claim to confirm — even Stowe told RNS he did not know for sure if Matson is the first — but Matson’s status is at least highly unusual and comes at a time when church officials are grappling with how to address transgender Catholics.
According to Matson, 39, his “disclosing,” as he describes it, is a moment years in the making. He offered his story as indicative of the often difficult path for trans Catholics, including those seeking life as a religious — a category that includes brothers and nuns.
“I am currently based in the Appalachian mountains of eastern Kentucky,” he wrote in an email to friends and supporters on Sunday. “I live in a hermitage at the top of a wooded hill, which I share with my German Shepherd rescue, Odie, and with the Blessed Sacrament, which was installed in my oratory shortly before Christmas.”
Raised in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), Matson converted to Catholicism in 2010 — four years, he noted, after transitioning in college, a step he refers to as a part of his “medical history” rather than a “central part of my personal identity.” After his conversion, Matson felt called to minister to people working in the arts, but knew he would encounter “issues” because of a 2000 Vatican document that, according to a Catholic News Service report from the time, declared that anyone who had undergone “sex-change” was ineligible “to marry, be ordained to the priesthood or enter religious life.”
Matson approached a canon lawyer to discuss his options and was told that only two aspects of Catholic life were categorically off the table: marriage and the priesthood. According to Matson, the canon lawyer recommended being upfront about his status as a transgender man in any vocational conversations with church leaders and mentioned the role of a diocesan hermit, which could prove less challenging than enlisting with an existing religious order.
The canon lawyer, Matson said, effectively conveyed that “there’s no problem as long as there’s a bishop who will accept you, because there’s no distinction by sex and you’re not in a community — you’re by yourself.”
What followed was roughly a decade of searching and no small amount of rejection. Living in the United Kingdom while pursuing a master’s degree, and later a Ph.D. in theology, Matson entered a vocational discernment program and approached the Jesuit order to ask if he could join.
“They said, ’No, we just don’t see how this would work for us,’ which was crushing, because that’s where I felt called,” Matson said.
Other communities offered similar responses, when they responded at all. “People who knew me said, ‘You clearly have a religious vocation,’ and these were all people who knew my medical history,” Matson said. “But when they would go to the people in the community in charge of making that decision, they … would often just refuse to even meet with me.”
In one instance, Matson said, a religious leader declined to meet simply to hear his experience as a trans man, saying doing so would be “a waste of time.”
But Matson’s call to religious life wouldn’t abate. While visiting a monastery during a retreat, he found himself unable to sleep, consumed with the idea of starting “a religious community of and for artists — artists who are living together, (operating) in the church through their art, and ministering to the loneliness and sense of precarity many artists experience.”
In 2015, he returned to New York City, where he had attended college. Having already taken private vows of poverty, chastity and obedience — witnessed by his spiritual director — before he arrived, he co-created a nonprofit called the Catholic Artist Connection. The group hosted retreats and connected artists to resources such as the Archdiocese of New York’s Sheen Center for Thought and Culture, where Matson began working as a programming associate.
Matson kept running into artists who wanted to pursue religious life, he said, and continued to feel the tug himself. But roadblocks kept appearing. “As I spoke to friends in the archdiocese, I knew somebody with a trans background was never going to be accepted into religious life in the Archdiocese of New York,” Matson said.
He tried again after a move to Minnesota in 2018, but his entreaties to various religious communities and orders were also rejected.
“I thought, well, if I can’t find a religious community to sponsor me, maybe what I need is a bishop,” Matson said.
A priest friend recommended different bishops to contact, beginning with Stowe, who was emerging as a leading voice among Catholics calling for a more tolerant approach to LGBTQ people. In 2020, Matson sent Stowe a letter, conveying his status as a transgender man, his vision for an artists’ community and his pull to religious life.
Stowe wrote back immediately, expressing his openness.
“It was an enormous relief,” Matson said. “I was in tears. I felt my hope revive.”
Stowe confirmed Matson’s account, saying the then-aspiring brother was recommended to him by a number of people.
“My willingness to be open to him is because it’s a sincere person seeking a way to serve the church,” Stowe said of Matson. “Hermits are a rarely used form of religious life … but they can be either male or female. Because there’s no pursuit of priesthood or engagement in sacramental ministry, and because the hermit is a relatively quiet and secluded type of vocation, I didn’t see any harm in letting him live this vocation.”
He added that Matson’s spiritual journey was “consistent with the calling of that particular vocation.”
Bishop John Stowe. (Video screen grab)
Matson moved to Kentucky, having already made progress on Stowe’s suggestion that he link up with an additional community through which to experience religious life. Matson entered the novitiate at a Benedictine monastery in 2021, hoping the formation offered by that path would eventually help him form a new religious community for artists.
Finally, in August 2022, Matson took his first vows as a diocesan hermit — a yearlong commitment — under Stowe’s direction.
For the next year, Matson “lived a life of basically spending half the day in prayer and half the day doing some form of work” that included producing and writing at a local theater.
Three years earlier, Matson read with frustration a document issued by the Vatican’s Congregation for Catholic Education titled “Male and Female He Created Them: Toward a Path of Dialogue on the Question of Gender Theory in Education.” The instructional letter rejected “calls for public recognition of the right to choose one’s gender.”
The Rev. Andrea Conocchia, center, introduces members of the Torvaianica transgender community to Pope Francis on Aug. 11, 2022, during the pope’s general audience at the Vatican. (Photo courtesy Andrea Conocchia)
In 2021, the Diocese of Marquette, in Michigan, followed with its own instruction to priests to refuse transgender people asking to be baptized or confirmed until they have “repented.”
“It was suddenly becoming a lot more difficult in the church to be trans,” Matson said.
But tolerance seems to be growing in some quarters. While Pope Francis has opposed elements of gender theory and recently called its proposals “ugly,” he has also met and dined with groups of transgender people.
In November 2023, the Vatican doctrine department ruled that transgender people may be baptized and serve as witnesses at Catholic weddings, so long as doing so “doesn’t cause scandal among the faithful.”
In the United States in March, a coalition led by Catholic nuns released a letter voicing support for transgender, nonbinary and gender-expansive individuals, implicitly rebuking a statement put forward by group of U.S. Catholic bishops discouraging Catholic health care groups from performing various gender-affirming medical procedures.
But overall, “Vatican-level documents that have come out on the subject have not engaged with the science at all,” Matson said, adding that he believes many diocesan-level statements are inconsistent in their attempts to categorize gender and cite scientific studies misleadingly. Matson has sent multiple private letters to Vatican offices, urging them to engage with transgender people and arguing that the church can embrace transgender people while maintaining orthodoxy.
As trans rights began to be debated in statehouses across the United States in recent months, conservative lawmakers have begun pushing bans on providing gender-affirming care for youth and, in some cases, adults.
Matson vented his frustrations to Stowe and his spiritual director, saying he wanted to speak out. But he said he was advised to first “build a foundation” in religious life for several years.
During that time, Matson had an experience that shook him. Attending a friend’s play in his religious habit, he was approached by a student who identified as trans and nonbinary. After asking if Matson was a monk, the student said they were raised Catholic, but that their parents had rejected their identity, and the student felt like they “don’t have a place in the church anymore.”
Matson responded by saying there were people in the church who would support the student, and Matson prayed with them, asking God to show the student how they are “wonderful the way you’ve made them.” The student, Matson said, grew emotional, thanking the hermit profusely and saying, “No one from the church has ever affirmed me for who I am.”
Matson, who renewed his vows in 2023, eventually began mulling a date to go public with his status. “I have to say something,” Matson told his spiritual director. He settled on Pentecost, which emphasizes preaching “the good news of God’s love to everyone,” he said. It was also the day in the church calendar when he’d been baptized years before.
“I can’t stand by and let this false and, at times, culpably ignorant understanding of what it means to be transgender continue to hurt people,” he said. “If I don’t say anything and allow the church to continue to make decisions based on incorrect information, then I’m not serving the church.”
Both Matson and Stowe said they are bracing for blowback after Sunday’s announcement. Matson said he is largely unconcerned with “online trolls” but is sensitive to people who are “legitimately concerned” that “accepting a trans person into religious life means Catholic anthropology gets thrown out the window.”
For people with such concerns, he said, he looks forward to engaging in dialogue. “I don’t have a hidden agenda, I just want to serve the church,” he said. “People can believe that or not.”
Both the hermit and his bishop are prepared for the possibility that church officials may push for Matson’s removal. Stowe acknowledged that “if I’m told to by higher authorities, then I will have to deal with that at the time.”
As for ever leaving Catholicism itself, Matson bristled at the idea, calling the church “my family.” “I’m Catholic,” he said. “I became Catholic after I transitioned because of the Catholic understanding — the sacramental understanding — of the body, of creation, of the desirability of the visible unity of the church and primarily because of the Eucharist.”
At the very least, Matson said, he hopes going public will spark dialogue about his fellow transgender Catholics, a discussion he believes can enhance unity among the body of believers.
“You’ve got to deal with us, because God has called us into this church,” he said. “It’s not your church to kick us out of — this is God’s church, and God has called us and engrafted us into it.”
Fancy that. Look at who's making the demands.
I said “arguably” in the context of this thread.
In reality, there really is no argument that this person’s gender confusion is indeed relevant. I’m assuming because they refer to this person as a “transgender man” that is an actual woman presenting as a man.
In that case, this person took vows under false pretenses, knowing that they were female but claiming to be male. They joined a male vocation knowing that they were not male. They knowingly deceived their order. This alone disqualifies them from continuing to participate in that order and vocation.
As I said, if they had never told anyone, and no one had ever discovered it, the church would have no obligation or ability to remedy it. In that case you could argue that transgenderism was irrelevant, but only in the context of there being no public scandal to correct.
But that also means that this person would have been living a life that they entered into under false circumstances, and that definitely is relevant to their eternal salvation.
In the Catholic Church, gender is absolutely relevant to almost everything. Men are priests and deacons and brothers. Women are nuns, or hold other non-ordained positions. This is integral to the Catholic church’s structure, and is unchangeable. On that, you would be wise to admit that you are mistaken.
Gender dysphoria is a psychological disease. Transgenderism does not even exist because you cannot change your sex. Knowingly allowing someone with a delusional disorder to persist in it, or worse even encouraging it, is not loving, or helpful, or Christian.
Best stop digging and hop out of this hole.
Love,
O2
First of all, the homosexualist, Stowe, refers to the pervert by the wrong pronoun.
Secondly, the pervert's (and Stowe's) history and hopes are no longer "relatively quiet or secluded".
They're both "out and proud", now.
No. I’m saying that priests according to the catechism are to be heterosexual celibate men.
Whatever else anyone wants to talk about is not within the Catholic Church
Sorry to disappoint you
The operative word in this article is “theater.”
That's not true. This is what you said:
I am saying that the subject of this persons or any clergy members gender is irrelevant.
Discussion of his gender is irrelevant
What’s to discuss? He’s to be a celibate heterosexual man
End of discussion
She is not a man; never was one, never will be one.
Why can't you and Stowe get that through your heads?
He meaning any priest
Not the subject of the article
“lived out their life quietly”
It’s a sign of the navel-gazing, narcissism of the age that people need to shout everything through a megaphone. They even shout out how proud they are of their abortions. Struggles with the flesh are such sanctifying things to quietly offer to God.
One of the nuns was quite brutal to St. Bernadette (1844-1879). When she died it was discovered that for quite a while she had been uncomplainingly kneeling on an excruciating tumor. That’s how the saints are. They suffer in silence.
“Whenever anything disagreeable or displeasing happens to you, remember Christ Crucified and be silent.” -St. John of the Cross (1542-1591)
I highly recommend that you re-read the article. It's all about her. She window-shopped for years until she found a couple of apostates, Stowe included, to hold her hand and play along with her charade.
Nowhere did any of the actors discuss her becoming a Catholic priest.
P.S.
because of a 2000 Vatican document that, according to a Catholic News Service report from the time, declared that anyone who had undergone “sex-change” was ineligible “to marry, be ordained to the priesthood or enter religious life.”
What part of the above do you and Stowe not understand?
Here’s the part I understand, to answer your question
A priest is to be a heterosexual male who is celibate
Any situation other than that is outside the Catholic Church
That is all
Again, this is what you said:
I am saying that the subject of this persons or any clergy members gender is irrelevant.
Benedictines, of course, are clergy members. So are the Sisters of Mercy, but according to you it doesn't matter what their birth gender was.
Do understand the following?
Nuns/sisters are to be females.
Monks and brothers are to be males.
Ya ok whatever
Finally you acknowledge what the article was about!
The article is irrelevant. There is nothing in it but narcissist rants from people in a pretend world. There is nothing in that article. These people are not practicing Catholicism. Whatever they’re doing is silly and irrelevant to society.
You mean those people, being the transgender, Stowe, the canon lawyer, etc., all of whom claim to practicing Catholics, just like you do?
“Matson, who is also a Benedictine oblate, believes he is the first openly transgender person in his position in the Catholic Church.”
You keep saying “irrelevant”, but I don’t think that word means what you think it means.
Are you saying that the article is irrelevant because these people are not acting like Catholics so can’t claim to be Catholic so we should just ignore them? Or because this doesn’t involve a priest and sexuality only matters for priests? Or that it is OK for someone to be in a religious order who is openly advocating for transgenderism as long as they are celebate?
This is an attack from on the Catholic church from within. The Catholic church specifically prohibits transexuals from marriage, ordination, and religious life. Your constant referral to celibacy of priests is irrelevant to this article since this person (I can’t look at that picture and use either pronoun) is not a priest, but is championing the idea that a transgender person should be able to join a religious order opposite their biological sex.
Scandal in this context is not gossip or discussing unpleasant information. Scandal is leading others astray, which is what this person and this ordained Catholic bishop are doing. It is not scandal to try to stop people from doing that even if it involves having to discuss salacious or otherwise unpleasant facts.
If you are trying to defend the Catholic church by saying this article is beneath discussion, you might want to clarify that, because that is not how you are coming across. It looks more like you are saying it is OK for a Catholic religious to be supported by a bishop to proclaim their deviant sexual proclivities as long as they are not a priest.
I’ve been trying to be polite, but my patience is wearing thin, so please clarify why you are so against this discussion.
Thanks,
Love,
O2
I’m saying that an article discussing an openly transgender priest is irrelevant because he is not practicing Catholicism
I stated it about eight times. Do you want to just go back and read what I said? Or do you get a kick out of tormenting and wasting the time of any given Catholic. You’re solidifying the anti Catholic reputation of this site if that’s your intention
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.