[Morgana]

"In what appears to be the 250th attack on a Catholic Church since the Dobbs decision"

Because they can't kill a baby!

[circlecity]

If this happened at an abortion clinic there would be a J6 level investigation by the Feds.

[Drew68]

They’re just rubbing it in at this point seeing how the pro-life movement has been thoroughly and completely defeated.

[Beowulf9]

Big money in abortion. Who gets the money.

[Flavious_Maximus]

They like to claim “my body my choice” except when it comes to the COVID injection. /spit

[Steve_Seattle]

" . . . but the left-wing leadership, DA and law enforcement do not treat them as bias crimes.”

This is why I no longer trust hate crime statistics. Over and over, I notice a reluctance to classify attacks on Christian churches as hate crimes. Attacks on churches are always treated as hate crimes IF there appears to be a racial motive, but a different standard is applied regarding attacks related to abortion, LGBTQ issues, historical grievances, or to Christianity or Catholicism in general.

The rationale is that these attacks are said to be politically motivated rather than motivated by religious bias, but such hair-splitting would never be done with regard to attacks on mosques. In the wake of 9/11, there was a surge in attacks on mosques, but law enforcement never said that these were motivated by the horrors of 9/11, but by anti-Muslim bias.

If there were even 10 attacks on mosques, it would be treated as a national scandal and crisis, but *250 attacks on Christian churches are passed over with a yawn.

*I have seen figures much higher than 250 - 350, 400, 600, even 800.

[No name given]

They would never dare to vandalize a mosque that way for obvious reasons.