The church, therefore, "should not talk about sexuality without considering the understanding we have of it today," he said, while also keeping in mind potential problems with modern understandings of sexuality.
Citing the Brazilian theologian Augustinian Sister Ivone Gebara, he said that the church's "theology of binary sexuality is no longer able to understand the complexity that we discover in ourselves."
1 posted on
03/24/2024 1:22:18 PM PDT by
ebb tide
To: Al Hitan; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; kalee; markomalley; miele man; Mrs. Don-o; ...
2 posted on
03/24/2024 1:23:10 PM PDT by
ebb tide
To: Oystir
Here’s another one you can add to your Cliffs Notes collection of Jorge’s Homos, oystir.
It should make your day!
3 posted on
03/24/2024 1:25:11 PM PDT by
ebb tide
To: ebb tide
>>>>> Citing the Brazilian theologian Augustinian Sister Ivone Gebara, he said that the church’s “theology of binary sexuality is no longer able to understand the complexity that we discover in ourselves.”
Male and female he created them. Once again I am reminded of Gal 1:8~9.
4 posted on
03/24/2024 1:32:41 PM PDT by
scouter
(As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
To: ebb tide
Tell it to Jesus my friend.
If you should ever see him.
5 posted on
03/24/2024 1:39:23 PM PDT by
M.K. Borders
(All I ask from government is the Liberty my Grandfather was born in.)
To: ebb tide
Sexuality has not changed since the days of Adam and Eve. God blesses sexual activity between married man and woman with no birth control involved. All others—sinful. Including homosexuality. In fact, he cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by God because of rampant homosexuality. Not too hard to understand.
6 posted on
03/24/2024 1:41:26 PM PDT by
rod5591
To: ebb tide
>>>>> The church, the priest said, must overcome “an essentially negative view of sexual desire, as if it were something to be repressed at every moment” and which suppresses a person’s desire for love.
The church does not have “an essentially negative view of sexual desire”, and there is a big difference between repression of a good desire and properly orienting it.
Either he is projecting his own sexual repression onto the church or he has a malformed understanding of the Catholic theology. My money is on both.
7 posted on
03/24/2024 1:49:34 PM PDT by
scouter
(As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
To: ebb tide
"...The church, therefore, "should not talk about sexuality without considering the understanding we have of it today," he said, while also keeping in mind potential problems with modern understandings of sexuality..." Gee. "Modern understandings of sexuality". What do you suppose he means by that?
10 posted on
03/24/2024 2:09:15 PM PDT by
rlmorel
(In Today's Democrat America, The $5 Dollar Bill is the New $1 Dollar Bill.)
To: ebb tide
a new theological ethics of sexuality"If it feels good, do it" is not new.
11 posted on
03/24/2024 2:15:12 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
To: ebb tide
has not helped people integrate their sexuality into their personhood -- an issue that, among the church's ordained ministers, has reared its head in the clerical sex abuse crisisSo if the sodomite priests had only integrated their disordered cravings into their personhood, they wouldn't have preyed upon innocent boys?
12 posted on
03/24/2024 2:18:39 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
To: ebb tide
Sorry, padre, but certain teachings are not the Church’s to decide
13 posted on
03/24/2024 2:20:45 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
(“Politicians are not born. They're excreted.” Marcus Tillius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: ebb tide
I have struggled and failed to integrate Christian charity into my feelings of disgust for these filthy faggot priests.
14 posted on
03/24/2024 2:25:51 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
To: ebb tide
I agree. They should think about it and then double down.
To: ebb tide
The church, therefore, "should not talk about sexuality without considering the understanding we have of it today,"
My wife and I considered it, and rejected it.
My main regret is that it is next to impossible to raise our children in peace without having "today's understanding" forced upon our children.
16 posted on
03/24/2024 3:39:35 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("If you can’t say something nice . . . say the Rosary." [Red Badger])
To: ebb tide
The church, therefore, "should not talk about sexuality without considering the understanding we have of it today," [Salesian Father Ronaldo Zacharias] said...
Salesian Father Ronaldo Zacharias seems to be auditioning to become head Vatican groomer. I wonder what Cardinal Victor Fernandez, the current head Vatican groomer, thinks about this upstart.
17 posted on
03/24/2024 3:43:47 PM PDT by
Montana_Sam
(Truth lives.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson