Here is what the Cardinal actually said, question and answer. Most browsers will translate. It speaks of the meaning of the synod, that it is NOT a theological meeting consisting of cardinals, bishops or of eggheads, or a rule making body, but, rather, a gathering of people (select or otherwise), among other ideas - some of which ebby finds fringe. It is not as inflammatory as ebby’s headline or his inferred conclusions:
https://www.cdt.ch/societa/chiesa-cattolica-quale-futuro-non-e-piu-il-tempo-delle-elite-346578
Once again, you don’t speak for me. You never have and never will.
Some people, like Grech the Creep and oystir the foister, just don't understand the phrase, "Synod of Bishops".
Three points:
1) What "ideas" do I find fringe? Put up or shut-up. Mind-reading is frowned upon on this forum.
2)The headlines are not mine, they are LifeSite's headlines.
3)What are my "inferred" conclusions. I have made no conclusions about the posted article. Mind-reading is frowned upon on this forum.
(Fr. Charles) Murr also speaks to Fiducia Supplicans, warning that Rome is doing to lady deacons what it did with irregular couples, in his opinion: playing with language – the women will be deacons but not deacons at the same time.
“Stop the game playing!” he exclaims. Looking to Rome’s approach to defending Fiducia Supplicans, Murr calls it “insulting” that “Rome takes us for such pathetic fools, that we’re really buying this. Nobody’s buying it.”
Except for fools like oystir.
Hey sinkspur, welcome back!