Posted on 01/08/2024 2:39:41 PM PST by ebb tide
You’re not wrong. If Bergoglio is Pope then one can be both a luciferian and a Pope.
Archbishop Viganò excommunicated in 3, 2 ...
I’m not so sure. He’s been saying a lot against Bergoglio lately and Bergoglio does nothing...unlike Strickland or Burke. It’s...odd.
“ arrest these heretical perverts!’”
From your lips to God’s ear
Yikes. I just read some of Rorate’s excerpts of Tucho’s tome. The man’s musings on sexuality are nearly indistinguishable from the drivel that used to appear in the newspaper column of Dr. Ruth Westheimer. That such an individual is now the Church’s top doctrine guy has got to be Satan’s idea of a hilarious joke.
The headline is a lie. That is all I said. That is a simple truth. The headline is an outrageous lie. Vig didn’t say it. The Guard can’t arrest the Pope, either. Don’t you understand simple English? We know the author doesn’t; he conflates the language with outrageous statements.
I wish you and your fellow God-Fearing Catholics well in extinguishing this vile presence from the Vatican.
It’s not a lie. It is you who is not telling the truth.
Read the full Tweet and take that foot out of your big mouth.
Show me an exact quote, or even a remote statement, that Vig said something even remotely like, “Guard, arrest the Pope.” Vig didn’t, and if he did, he would be gone faster than you can spell, S T R I C K L A N D.
The headline is FAKE and so is the article. All inflammatory lies.
I already have, in Post #20.
Are you that dense?
Viganò wrote on X (formerly Twitter.) “The Swiss Guards have sworn to defend the See of Peter, not the one who is systematically demolishing it. Let them therefore be faithful to their oath and arrest these heretical perverts!”
https://twitter.com/CarloMVigano/status/1744347265123160184
And Ebby, too. No, this doesn’t say, “arrest the Pope.” As much as you want that outcome. Vig didn’t say it. The lying headline/author said it. Vig may pray for it. You may pray for it. But the fact of the matter is that it wasn’t said. Vig won’t say it, either. As I said, if Vig, or any priest, did threaten the Pope like this, with arrest, Vig would be in a woodshed you don’t understand.
And below is a photo of two perverts, Bergoglio and Tucho.
So, Yes, Vigano did call for the Swiss guard to arrest them; and, Yes, you are wrong.
P.S. It doesn't matter whether the Swiss guard will act on Vigano's call or no, but he did call for their arrest.
And there's no way you can honestly say he did not call for their arrest; but then again, honesty is really not your forte.
Regardless of whatever theological differences we may have, I thank you for your good will and for your prayers on our behalf.
You show yourself to be a Christian Gentleman.
May God abundantly bless you.
Did Vig post the picture to the inflammatory article? NO, he did not. Vig did not utter the words you post. Vig did not mention the Pope. If he did, do you think there would be consequences? I do. I bet Vig does too.
You can agree with infantile picture book. You can agree with the author and headline editor’s defamatory composition of false values. But Vig didn’t say it. Keep trying though. You blaspheme the Pope and Vig with your nonsense.
Vigano posted the photo within his tweet.
So once again you are proved wrong and too proud to admit it.
Neither the article nor I have talked about consequences; you’re little strawman is up in flames.
Give it up; you’re just digging a deeper hole for yourself.
It appears oystir is actually a foister.
Whatever his deal is, he’s not worth my time and effort.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.