Antipope under the name of Benedict XIII, b. at Illueca, Aragon, 1328; d. at the Peñiscola, near Valencia, Spain, either 29 Nov., 1422, or 23 May, 1423. He was elected 28 Sept., 1394, deposed at the Council of Constance 26 July, 1417.
Ping
Jorge and Tucho: Two schismatics rehabilitating fellow schismatics in Frankenchurch.
Well, I don’t know about rehabilitating him, but I think it is possible to think you were properly elected Pope when you weren’t. Peter de Luna (as I always heard him called) may well have been acting in good faith. St. Vincent Ferrer backed him as well. (St. Vincent had incredible charisms, including raising people from the dead, but apparently he didn’t have the gift of discernment).
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Catholic Church getting tough!
I care nothing for Benedict XIII, but this might make it easier to rehabilitate the Templars, who seem to me a more troubling case.
It would be hard to treat him as a legitimate pope at this late date--for one thing, there was a legitimate Benedict XIII later (just as the 20th-century John XXIII took the number XXIII although there had been a John XXIII during the schism).
Are Pedro de Luna's adherents called Lunatics?
The Current Pope is a Commie.
Must approve heretics so that someday Bergoglio can be declared a saint.
Anti-Popes have to look out for each other.