Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Hebrews 11:6

I am not sure I would call Queen Vashti rebellious. I was always sort of on her side. She was called in to “dance” for a bunch of guests, the implication is like a strip tease or sexual performance, which I would have refused too!

Perhaps I misunderstand but I don’t think you are to obey your husband if he commands you to do that.


6 posted on 08/31/2023 7:27:30 AM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero

I agree with you entirely. Nevertheless, she did defy and rebel—I leave it up to the viewer whether she had sufficient justification.

I suppose one might also make the case that Rachel was merely trying to rescue Laban from idol-worship, or that Mrs. Job was simply trying to spare Job from needless suffering.


8 posted on 08/31/2023 7:38:46 AM PDT by Hebrews 11:6 (“It was full of large fish, 153, but even with so many the net was not torn. ” John 21:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Persevero; Hebrews 11:6

Well, without Queen Vashti’s rebellion (no matter the reason), we would not have Esther.

Again, everything happening according to God’s purpose.


16 posted on 08/31/2023 7:32:10 PM PDT by SisterK (it's controlled demolition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson