Posted on 03/01/2023 5:55:21 PM PST by marshmallow
The news comes after the National Archives was hit with a lawsuit in connection with the incident and subsequently issued a public apology.
WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — The National Archives has fired the security supervisor who instructed March for Life participants to cover up or remove their pro-life hats and clothing, The Daily Signal reported Thursday. The news comes after Sen. Ted Cruz and Rep. Chip Roy, both Texas Republicans, penned a letter last week demanding answers.
On January 20, just after the first March for Life since the overturning of Roe v. Wade, a group of pro-lifers entered the National Archives museum where they were instructed by security officers to take off or conceal the pro-life messages on their apparel if they wanted to remain in the museum.
In a letter obtained by The Daily Signal, acting Archivist Debra Steidel Wall affirmed that the incident “was contrary to NARA [National Archives and Records Administration] policy” and said the primary individual involved has been fired.
The letter came in response to a letter led by Sen. Cruz and Rep. Roy and signed by 21 Republican colleagues demanding “answers about allegations that pro-life Americans were harassed and threatened with expulsion from the National Archives Museum.”
According to Wall, the security supervisor in question was a private contractor. She said the supervisor had directed other contractors to tell the pro-lifers not to enter the museum wearing their pro-life garb.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
Some poor schmuck gets fired for doing what his master and overseer told him to do.
It’s a start.
Now earmark some of his pension funds to pay the lawsuit settlement (so I don’t have to)
If the order did, in fact, originate with this supervisor, it’s curious no name or sex is given, or no picture. My money is on it being a liberal female, possibly LBQTwhatever.
And now, how about the security nazis at the National Air and Space Museum that did the same thing?
No name no face pic, but no job either.
So it’s a start.
From the article:
“LifeSiteNews previously reported that, on the same day, another group of pro-lifers were told to remove or cover their pro-life apparel while on-site at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum.
Responding to requests for answers from Republican lawmakers, the Smithsonian agreed that the directives were wrong but suggested that nobody would be losing their jobs for it.”
_______________
So, the one firing was to squelch a lawsuit. Nobody should as suing over the prior violations. Disgusting.
“ No name no face pic, but no job either.
So it’s a start.”
That way they can be rehired next week and we are no more the wiser.
Adios azho.
Transparency be damned!!!!!!
“They” take us for dumb losers. Let’s prove them wrong.
Demand the name and picture.
Not good enough. Sue that person as an individual for violating the pro-lifers’ civil rights and take this criminals money.
Probably so!
Her termination was NOT enough. Just firing these people is NOT enough!!! Something MUST be done which puts the absolute fear of God into people so they do not repeat this type of behavior!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Exactly. No picture, name or any way to ID this person to make sure they do not get a responsible job ever again for having done this.
“Fired” and “No Job” simply means, in communist-speak, surreptitiously transferred to another position where publicly enforcing communist dogma is Ok...
They fired the SUPERVISOR who issued the order.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.