Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SouthernClaire

‘Some people’ haunting these threads will not watch the entire video because it is like tossing water on the witch of the West. They don’t want Truth, they want their traditions and false prophetess’s ‘declarations’.


3,369 posted on 07/16/2022 11:36:26 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3368 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN; SouthernClaire

——>‘Some people’ haunting these threads will not watch the entire video because it is like tossing water on the witch of the West. They don’t want Truth, they want their traditions and false prophetess’s ‘declarations’.

Your assertions are dopey and false as usual. I’ve watched many of your posted videos in their entirety. In fact, I’ve broken many of them down by the minute and second in discussing their lies. You will be happy to know that I did watch this entire video and there was nothing new revealed, as always. Basically it was another red herring “look to the Essenes, not the bible” video.

I’ve said it before that Ken Johnson is either a moron or a liar. No way on this earth he doesn’t know how the rapture theory was traced from Jesuit Futurism, YET HE NEVER MENTIONS IT (that makes him a liar). Every Protestant Reformer knew and REJECTED it. It was a lame attempt to distance themselves from TRUE claims that they, the Catholic church, are the Antichrist power. The Reformers were historicists. You believe in Jesuit Futurism lies. You have the following people to thank for the Rapture theory... (ALL HISTORICAL FACT, not vague and nebulous Essene mumbo jumbo):

FRANCISCO RIBERA (Jesuit)
CARDINAL ROBERT BELLARMINE (Jesuit)
MICHAEL WALPOLE (Jesuit)
MANUEL De LACUNZA (Jesuit)

Manuel De Lacunza (1731–1801), a Jesuit from Chile, wrote a manuscript in Spanish titled La Venida del Mesias en Gloria y Magestad (”The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty”), under the pen name of Juan Josafa [Rabbi] Ben-Ezra about 1791. Lacunza wrote under an assumed Jewish name to obscure the fact that he was a Catholic, in order to give his book better acceptance in Protestantism, his intended audience. Also an advocate of Futurism, Lacunza was deliberately attempting to take the pressure off the papacy by proposing that the Antichrist was still off in the future. His manuscript was published in London, Spain, Mexico and Paris between 1811 and 1826. Volume 1 Volume II Volume III

La Venida del Mesias en Gloria y Magestad online at the National Library of Chile (in Spanish).

Edward Irving (1792-1834), a Scottish Presbyterian and forerunner of the Pentecostal and Charismatic movements, translated Lacunza’s work from Spanish into English in a book titled The Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty with a Preliminary Discourse, published in London in 1827 by L.B. Seeley & Sons, which included Irving’s own lengthy preface.

Margaret McDonald (ecstatic utterances) WAS A MEMBER OF EDWARD IRVING’S CHURCH

Samuel Roffey Maitland
James H. Todd
John Henry Newman

JOHN NELSON DARBY is most responsible for what all who believe in the Rapture, relate to. He tweaked it into the lie it is today, the lie that you believe in with all your heart.

Arno C. Gaebelein
Cyrus Ingerson Scofield
Lewis Sperry Chafer

Dallas Theological Seminary is the key place where the Jesuit concepts were taught to thousands of Pastors, including today’s top TV and radio personalities.

Here’s something interesting…

Samuel Prideaux Tregelles (1813-1875), formerly with the Plymouth Brethren, he became Presbyterian, and published The Hope Of Christ’s Second Coming in 1864, in which he gave the following testimony on the origin of the secret rapture:
“I am not aware that there was any definite teaching that there would be a secret rapture of the Church at a secret coming, until this was given forth as an “utterance” in Mr. Irving’s Church, from what was there received as being the voice of the Spirit. But whether any one ever asserted such a thing or not, it was from that supposed revelation that the modern doctrine and the modern phraseology respecting it arose. It came not from Holy Scripture, but from that which falsely pretended to be the Spirit of God, while not owning the true doctrine of our Lord’s incarnation in the same flesh and blood as His brethren, but without taint of sin.” — Footnote 1 for Chapter 9, pg 35.

Daniel is crystal clear in that the LITTLE HORN/ANTICHRIST power comes out of ROME, the 4th beast. You have been fooled by Satan into believing the exact opposite. Everything that you and your false teachers/prophets believe in is influenced by Satan. You have all been bamboozled.

http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch//antichrist.htm
The Catholic Origins of Futurism and Preterism


3,370 posted on 07/18/2022 3:15:59 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3369 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson