Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MurphsLaw
Finally.. was that so hard? A post that goes to the heart of the topic- which does or doesn't really even need to be discussed. But this is fresh air rather, and a true focus- rather than the usual "Catholic bad".... I don't know why it's ironic, but you posted a refutation to the development of doctrine. Do you disagree with the process of doctrine evolving over time?

Oh, please, Murph! The "heart" of the topic has been my point and true focus all along. The "Usual 'Catholic bad'"? There goes the persecution complex again.

No one has problems with someone coming to a deeper understanding of the tenets of the Christian faith but with the "development" of brand new doctrine not found in Scripture (the whole counsel of God) and definitely not with those that contradict Scripture.

To declare that Mary was conceived without sin and that she never sinned her entire life after she was born raises all kinds of problems with Divinely-inspired Scripture and was why Jesus didn't teach it, the Apostles didn't teach it, the early church didn't teach it (an optional "pious belief" by some, maybe, but not as doctrine) and it took the Roman Catholic church 18 centuries to declare it as "official" Catholic dogma and therefore, obligatory acceptance by all of Christendom. Protestants don't reject the IC because of hatred for Mary OR of the Catholic church. It's because the word of God is true and we can be confident that all Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for instruction, for conviction, for correction, and for training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be complete, fully equipped for every good work.

Newman trashed the Vincentian Canon (though he denied doing so) - The famous threefold test of Catholic orthodoxy expressed by St. Vincent of LĂ©rins (400-50) in his two memoranda (Comonitoria): "Care must especially be had that that be held which was believed everywhere [ubique], always [semper], and by all [ab omnibus]." By this triple norm of diffusion, endurance, and universality, a Christian can distinguish religious truth from error. There is no unanimous consent of the fathers on many of the novel dogmas developed over the last few centuries by the RCC. The perversion of the doctrine of justification by faith bothers me way more than the IC, but that's a discussion for another day.

I reject the authority of the Roman Catholic church to dictate to every Christian what can and cannot be believed. God gave us His written word so that through it and the indwelling Holy Spirit, who leads us into all truth, we can have confidence in our faith. I respect your right to hold to your beliefs. Please do so for me.

241 posted on 12/12/2021 6:18:45 PM PST by boatbums (Lord, make my life a testimony to the value of knowing you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: boatbums


I respect your right to hold to your beliefs.
Please do so for me.


Deal.
I admit I can be sensitive... but omly out of a defensive love for Christ in the Eucharist, Holy Church, and the Mother of our Lord - but any tempering does not relieve me of my obligation to share that faith- as undesirable as it may be for some. There is a Joy...that should in turn consume anyone seeking that Faith, that they can't know just looking in. I understand you personally have found that another way.

Can I still ask again though if you agree or disagree with the validity of Doctrine developing over time?
244 posted on 12/12/2021 8:47:16 PM PST by MurphsLaw ("Behold a virgin shall be with child, and bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson