Posted on 09/22/2021 8:33:55 AM PDT by ebb tide
Not just the devils attack the Church, Murph. I would think you know that.
And personally, I think Bergolio, not EWTN, is attacking the Church.
God help us! Deus Vult!
Well done. You managed to demonstrate
(I) that you have to cut an entire sentence in order to change what the “they” is referring to, in order to support this false claim.
(ii) that you need to resort to intimidation and name calling to defend this false claim because the actual quote does not support it.
This is like arguing over whether Trump said “all Mexicans are criminals” (spoiler alert — he didn’t). When you challenge people who make this claim they use carefully edited quotes, name calling and intimidation.
Do you believe EWTN has been attacking the church, Murph?
If not, why would Bergoglio mention them in the same paragraph as doing "the works of the devil"?
Care to try?
Who is doing the works of the devil besides "a large Catholic television channel that has no hesitation in continually speaking ill of the pope". Who was Bergoglio speaking of, edwinland?
Where was there any name-calling, edwinland?
Once again, you bear false witness, Murph. I referred to Bergoglio and Barron as heretics, not you.
Catholics cannot help but being associated with heretics in their lives.
It's another thing, Murph, to promote and defend those heretics.
So I am not a heretic then?
Back on the sauce?
If you speak to the Catholics of Buenos Aires, they will tell you of the miraculous change that has taken over Jorge Mario Bergoglio. Their dour, unsmiling archbishop was turned overnight into the smiling, jolly Pope Francis, the idol of the people with whom he so fully identifies. If you speak to anyone working in the Vatican, they will tell you about the miracle in reverse. When the publicity cameras are off him, Pope Francis turns into a different figure: arrogant, dismissive of people, prodigal of bad language and notorious for furious outbursts of temper which are known to everyone from the cardinals to the chauffeurs.
.........
After nearly five years of his pontificate, Francis is showing that he is not the democratic, liberal ruler that the cardinals thought they were electing in 2013, but a papal tyrant the like of whom has not been seen for many centuries.
Emphasis mine.
Why would you ask me? Don't you know, yourself?
Perhaps you should have been an altar boy then you might realize that someone else's sin is no excuse for your own. Our Lord died for you and will ask you on Judgement Day why you left him. Have a good answer ready. The Church has been around for 2000 years, this guy is an example of a bad pope, we get them from time to time. Ignore him and focus on your salvation through Our Lord Jesus Christ.
I can only imagine what Mother Angelica would have said about the ImPopester. She didn’t put up with fools, especially those who directly refute the teachings of the Catechism.
First of all, Bergolio is not the Pope. Benedict XVI is still alive, thus he is the True Pope. Bergolio is the ImPopester. He is also a heretic who has excommunicated himself by his own words and actions. (Pachamama among other things.)
Thanks for the polite response.
BTW I wrote in my post that I was an alter boy. But that is not the reason for my reply.
Re-read my post carefully and you will notice that I did not rebuke God. I believe that God is Omnipotent, Omniscient and Omnipresent.
He is not in need of cash nor is he in need of some pompous jerk to speak for him. I is not God that I don’t believe in , it is clergy, various religions and anything else that I learned about God. He sent a messenger to St Francis of Assisi and without getting into the full story, he said that St Francis could no more put the ocean into a hole he had dug than he could understand the Blessed Trinity. Some creep from Argentina is not his word.
Confitior deo omnipotenti.
Your question already makes my point, very neatly. Just as you say, Pope Francis was speaking of EWTN when he said that EWTN is broadcasting attacks on the Pope, which attacks are the work of the devil. Here's the full quote:
Pope Francis: “There is, for example, a large Catholic television channel that has no hesitation in continually speaking ill of the pope. I personally deserve attacks and insults because I am a sinner, but THE CHURCH does not deserve them. They are the work of the devil. I have also said this to some of them.”
This highly tendentious blog then changed what the Pope said, making it "Pope Francis Calls EWTN "The Work Of The Devil"
If they said "Pope Francis Says EWTN sometimes does the Work Of The Devil" that would be accurate.
Is that a distinction without a difference? Maybe to non-Catholics it appears so, but ask yourself this question: have you ever sinned? Whose work did you do when you sinned? Was it the work of Jesus Christ who you served in your sin? No. In Catholic theology it was the work of the Devil.
So if I put up a headline "Ebb Tide Admits that He is the Work of the Devil" would you similarly defend my headline as being accurate? Because that's the tendentious little clickbait maneuver that this despicable blog just pulled.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.