[ebb tide]

But if say a person accepted a stolen $20 from the bank as legal tender in an exchange of goods in a shop, would that person also be liable for profiting from money that was stolen?

Yes, he would be liable if he was aware of the crime, just as you are aware of the deathvaxxes. It's call money laundering versus dead baby laundering.

[Bayard]

“Yes, he would be liable if he was aware of the crime, just as you are aware of the deathvaxxes. It’s call money laundering versus dead baby laundering.”

So we’re talking about Baby laundering now? Different subject from baby murdering.

But in your instance, the driver and the shop keeper have very different crimes associated to them based on the concrete subjects we’re talking about.

Morality and Ethics btw is entirely based on rationality, because that is more about the truth than just, “muh feelings.”