Sounds like you are not going to answer the question. That must mean that you don’t have an answer that will refute my claim that your position means that there is no penalty for unrepentant sin, and that is tantamount to a license to sin, if that saved person so wishes (and many do). You called me a liar, falsely. Then, you tried to cover it up by refusing to answer the question or saying you and your crew have answered it multiple times but I just don’t comprehend it or simply refuse to believe (more lies and bearing false witness) because you know what the answer really is. And, there goes your once saved, always saved, no matter what happens later in that life, creed. Yes, that means that you bore false witness against me. Some kind of Christian you are, aren’t you? You could have just answered the question and let the chips fall where they may. But then you would have been boxed into a corner, right? You probably figured that one out pretty quick, didn’t you?
I didn’t think Phil’s posting could get any more ridiculous. It has, and it has now gone into the ugly category also. And that ugliness aimed at a wonderful Christian lady.
Phil will not take the answers to the question he asked because he doesn’t like them and they don’t fit with his religious organization’s brainwashing.
Even Daniel gave a great response, as yours, MHG and Metmom’s have been, and was then told his answer was too long. I can only surmise that Phil doesn’t like the true answer to his question.
I asked him earlier if God knew when He saved a person that that person would later commit sins. As yet I’ve received no answer.
He’s pretty demanding on others and yet won’t answer questions asked of him.
I hope that all would come out of works-based religious organizations and come to Christ Jesus on His terms. I realize, however, that some like there status in such just fine and seem to believe that God is going to owe them Heaven.
Blessings to you, Boatbums. You didn’t deserve the ugly response ... especially since you are a Christian lady.