Replies

I'm so sorry; I had confused you with your pal, Murphs Law.

Friend,
I do not find communion in your Christianity any longer and you shoulda noticed I dont engage you very much anymore... due to the caustic nature of your replies....while your passion is admirable for traditional causes, you cross too many lines that diminish that spirit.
That you call fellow Catholics heretics and apostates is uncalled for, but you do so in a back-biting, unchristian manner- which is worse than many of the sins you constantly call into public scrutiny. That you choose to memorize and/or are cataloguing my posts - crosses into very creepy territory- please stop.

That we- or anyone- disagrees on the invalidity of the SSPX being schismatic is to be expected. But yes, for Catholics... the FSSP or EO Liturgies ARE ALWAYS preferable - and no Catholic should EVER validate SSPX SCHISMATIC ones. Cdl. Burke has stated this position as well.

That this breakaway SSPX group - who craps all over the guidance of the Holy Spirit, illegitimately denying Apostolic succession of the Church- in the same way it's enemies do... will be eternally and sinfully UN-Forgivable, for anyone. I hope that is understandable for now.
Best wishes.

First of all, I'm no friend of yours or your heretic hero, "Hell is Empty" Barron.

Most of my critiques are against Barron, not you. It's when you bear false witness about Catholics, I engage you.

I consider neither of you, nor Barron to be orthodox Catholics.

Secondly, I think you, like Francis, is thinking the Holy Ghost is constantly talking to y'all and He's constantly changing His mind.

I don't think the two of you would recognize the Holy Ghost even if He knocked you off your high horses.

That we- or anyone- disagrees on the invalidity of the SSPX being schismatic is to be expected. But yes, for Catholics... the FSSP or EO Liturgies ARE ALWAYS preferable - and no Catholic should EVER validate SSPX SCHISMATIC ones. Cdl. Burke has stated this position as well.

You never said EO, you said Orthodox, i.e. schismatics. Don't try to crawfish out that one.

That this breakaway SSPX group - who craps all over the guidance of the Holy Spirit, illegitimately denying Apostolic succession of the Church- in the same way it's enemies do... will be eternally and sinfully UN-Forgivable, for anyone.

Lies are never understandable. The SSPX has never denied apostolic succession.

And for you information, Archbishop Lefebve was ordained as a Holy Ghost father in 1929 and elected Superior General of the Holy Ghost Fathers in 1962, so I highly doubt he, or the the many priests he has formed, had or are "crapping" over the Holy Ghost's guidance.

You, Barron and Bergoglio may be getting some supernatural guidance, but it certainly isn't from a holy spirit.

“Cdl. Burke has stated this position as well”

__________

NFN, but there is need to call in the artillary to support your indictment od ebb tide either.

Surely it would not surprise you if, given the warp and woof of the most recent Bergoglian utterance, which if it is to be take seriously at all must at least be considered to have oblitetated once and for all the generous Ratzingerian accommodation known as the Hermeneutic of Continuity, Cardinal Burke himself and others like him are in the process of a change in their cast of mind regarding those who regarded with utter horror the post-conciliar changes to the Roman Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass?

Do you not think it is possible that Cardinal Burke and other prelates like him are in the process of “re-scrutinizing” the goals and apparent underlying motivations of the VII Council Fathers, and that such fresh scrutiny could potentially lead to a broad indictment of same along lines similar to the one issued so long ago by Archbishop LeFebvre and which, in the Archbishop’s mind at least, justified his then-controversial decision to name as SSPX bishops the four priests he deemed necessary to allow the the Mass of the Ages, which he undoubtedly and quite rightly treasured, to survive and thrive after his death?