Replies

"Wow! PTL!"

Rather, only the metaphorical understanding easily conflates with the rest of Scripture, and especially as regards John 6, versus the incarnate Christ being manifest as an non-existent inanimate object, whose appearance and all testable aspects do not conform to what He materially became in His incarnation, nor any Divine being, meaning a false Christ.

See here and more, by God's grace:

The Lord's Supper: metaphorical commemoration or the consumption of the metaphysical "real" body and blood of the Lord Jesus?

(Note: allow scripts for pop up Bible verses

Table of Contents

Introduction

1. Catholic teaching on the Eucharist

2. Metaphorical versus literal language

3. Supper accounts and John 6: Conformity to Scripture, and consequences of the literalistic interpretation.

4. 1Cor. 10,11

5. The Lord's Supper in the record and descriptions of the New Testament church

6. Purely literal versus the contrived Catholic interpretation

7. The nature of the Catholic metaphysical explanation

8. The Lord's Supper is not a sacrifice for sins

9. Absence of the sacerdotal Eucharistic priesthood

10. Metaphorical view of Jn. 6 is not new.

11. Endocannibalism

12. Conclusion