There is a small clue which can help you see differences in groups. One is to realize Jesus gave theMatthew 24 & 25 Discourse to Jewish men regarding their Jewish questions regarding the Temple and the signs of the END of The Age. Matthew 24-25 was not given to the Church. Not until the Upper Room Discourse after Judas left to betray Jesus was the Church Age introduced, found in John 14.. Seeking to fit the Matthew 24-25 Discourse onto the church is an error that you can correct easily by going to Matthew 23 and recognizing the signs of to whom Jesus was about to reveal the future during the seven years coming of The Tribulation / Jacob’s Trouble. Whom is Jesus addressing: Matthew 23:37 “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often would I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing! 38 See, your house is left to you desolate. 39 For I tell you, you will not see me again, until you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’”
Like as Antiochus Epiphanes would seem to fufil Daniel's prophecy of the Abomination of Desolation but which was a precursor of what the Lord prophesied i n Mt. 24, so I also see the events of 70AD as being a precursor of a yet future fulfillment.
But good Christians can disagree on this, and the denial of the 1k reign of Christ (which is what this thread is about) should see less toleration, if at all.