Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino
It’s symbolic and not literal.

Not according to transubstantiation.
88 posted on 02/13/2021 9:50:42 AM PST by Old Yeller (Nana Pelosi is a manure salesman with a mouthful of samples. Thus the slurred speaking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Old Yeller; DesertRhino
"It’s symbolic and not literal."

Not according to transubstantiation.

--------------------------------------

Neither of these is the teaching of the Church. The Church teaches that Jesus is truly and substantially present in the Eucharist. It is not literal or we would see the man Jesus physically sitting on our altars. It's not merely symbolic in that it would then just be an empty ritual, which Jesus would never command us to do as he clearly did in John 6 and at the Last Supper. It is a symbol, but only in the sense that we cannot see a physical manifestation the heavenly reality that is there.

96 posted on 02/13/2021 10:15:35 AM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson