I did not see any false statements in Bp. Schneider's side of the interview. Two "open" items -- perhaps remaining to be explained more thoroughly than they were -- included: (a) the role of financial capital in vaccine development, since Bp. Schneider encourages "scientists" to work on ethically acceptable alternatives but seems to neglect to acknowledge that vaccine development requires not just excellent science but also excellent business planning, including a whole lot of money; (b) why cooperation in evil is more remote for a taxpayer who knows their taxes will be used to fund abortion than for a vaccine-recipient who knows their vaccine was tested on a cell line derived from an abortion. Giving His Excellency the benefit of the doubt, there may not have been time to address these questions, which may have shed further light on the important issues involved.
Maybe because the former is involuntary and the latter is voluntary?