The church (building) and property belong to the Bishop, not the pastor and not a separate corporate body (all property is held by the bishop in Catholic churches. I think the bishop can yestify that they did not have permission to be there, doing what they were doing. Like if if a grocery store manager were having some sort of orgy while on company property.
I feel sure they can bring some kind of criminal charge against Fr. Whoopee.
“The church (building) and property belong to the Bishop, not the pastor and not a separate corporate body (all property is held by the bishop in Catholic churches. I think the bishop can yestify that they did not have permission to be there, doing what they were doing. Like if if a grocery store manager were having some sort of orgy while on company property.
I feel sure they can bring some kind of criminal charge against Fr. Whoopee.“ Talk about not reading what I wrote. The article made no mention of the bishop pressing charges, the police just charged the pastor based on the video a Peeping Tom took through a window of the church. The pastor engaging in sex acts in the church, like having sex in your place of business where you are legally allowed to be, is a fireable offense but it’s not really a matter of law enforcement.
I suspect that you might be an uptight a-hole that thinks everything should be a matter of criminal law enforcement. You may not be of that persuasion but I suspect it may be so.
Please tell me that you have not campaigned against dancing in your town and I might change my mind.