This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 09/09/2020 1:17:58 AM PDT by Religion Moderator, reason:
Childishness, locked Posters, please review your posts to see what is not allowed in the Religion Forum. |
Posted on 08/09/2020 7:46:24 AM PDT by MurphsLaw
I can’t help it if facts insult you. But I can pray for you.
Are you going to apologize for calling me Lurch?
Sure. I didn’t know it offended you.
You’ve never complained before.
Try the athanasian creed ebb - held as true by the Roman Church
3. And the catholic faith is this: That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity;
4. Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance.
5. For there is one person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Spirit.
6. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is all one, the glory equal, the majesty coeternal.
see the part about not confounding the persons?
Youve never complained before.
***
So claiming that you never insult people and then actually insulting people is only a lie if they complain about it?
Apology—somewhat amusedly—accepted.
6. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is all one, the glory equal, the majesty coeternal.
You are such a good cherry picking catholic. The two lines before it:
4. Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance.
5. For there is one person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Spirit.
Or do you really state that the Father the Son and the Spirit are not separate persons?
I've never claimed that. But I do admit I may have insulted some folks for proclaiming the Catholic faith. Didn't Jesus Christ insult some folks?
Speaking of that, what do you find as gobbledy gook in the Preface of the Holy Trinity in post #630?
Specifics, please.
You’re so funny.
The Athanasian Creed is not in scripture. So much for “sola scriptura” defense!
changing the subject. The Roman church recognizes the athanasian creed as authoritative. an asked you if you believe what your church recognizes not a discussion of sola scriptura. You never answer a question. just change the subject and deflect. good night ebb
No.
See post #630. That's what I believe.
I’m not changing the subject.
It was you who have been arguing sola scriptura and I’m pointing out your hypocrisy in going outside of it.
I have answered it. See post #630. Do you have problems with the Preface of the Holy Trinity? If so, what are they?
What you keep projecting is not what this protestant has learned sola scriptura means. But that is understandable since as a Catholic you do not believe one can be born again until death and the many 'works of righteousness' you imagine you have done to earn eternal life are counted up.
I am convinced that Jesus eliminated works of righteousness for any who are not born again because without The Righteousness of Christ imputed to the human spirit there is no righteousness to be source for works of righteousness.
Neither is.....
Catholic
Blessed Mother
Mother of God
Trinity
pope
purgatory
sacrament
holy water
confirmation
sacred tradition
catechism
eucharist
rosary
assumption (especially of Mary)
immaculate conception
And a whole host of other fables that Catholicism purports to be truth on par with God breathed, Holy Spirit inspired Scripture.
So, Catholic religious reasoning goes thus....
Mary is the mother of Jesus, and Jesus is God, therefore, Mary is the mother of God.
Continued is, God is three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
If Mary is mother of God, and mother of God the Son, then Mary is mother of God the Father, and God, the Holy Spirit as well.
Or are you denying that the Father and the Holy Spirit are God?
Then how can Mary be the *faithful spouse of the Holy Spirit*, if shes his mom?
Yes you are, in this very post as you are claiming you are not changing the subject.
You are claiming that MomMD is has been arguing sola scriptura, so I checked out her posting history looking for where she did that on this thread and found ZERO places where she even came near addressing it.
So it appears that you are falsely accusing MomMD of something she did not do.
So you could either show us the posts where she did this, or man up and apologize for falsely accusing her of something she did not do.
Catholics like to make up strawmen about what they think sola scriptura is and knock it down and then demand we defend some fabrication they invented.
Time and again theyve been told what we define it as, and it falls on deaf ears. I have not met one FRoman who ever even acknowledged how we define it as nor accepted the correction to their errant belief.
They just double down on their fabrication, and their demands we defend their mistaken ideas.
Its kind or ironic that the group that claims responsibility for giving us Scripture and claims that it is the only entity capable of correctly interpreting it, fights its authority so hard.
They claim their prelate, the so called pope, can speak infallibly and has supreme authority but when it comes to acknowledging that Scripture, as God breathed, Holy Spirit inspired Divine revelation is authoritative and adequate to bring us to salvation, and equip us for every good work, complete in Christ, the teeth gnashing begins.
And after claiming they wrote the Scripture which they now claim isnt good enough, they tell us to accept sacred tradition and ex cathedra statements and trust them.
Why is beyond me because if the very Scripture they claim to have authored is so inadequate that it now needs to be added to, why should we trust them to get it right this time?
At least you start your strawman with a question; even though it is the same as the, "Have you stopped beating your wife?" one.
Your statement/accusation SO reeks of hypocrisy!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.