That makes no sense either. Where would you
expect his DNA to be after his accuser said he raped her repeatedly? Take a guess, it’s not hard.
Was she checked right away. Did she get taken to the hospital after any of the rapes? Or was this later after she finally got someone to believe?
Without having been in the court room I can’t answer those questions. I never take the word of a single news report to frame the entire story. It is always framed from one side or another. Obviously the jury decided there was enough evidence not that they are infallible.
That was my first thought too, but it is possible he wanted to make sure she didn't get pregnant so he may have let fly such that some ended up on the bed frame, though I think this is rather unlikely.
This whole story seems fishy. Both sides. One of the things that doesn't surprise me is the girl is suing the adoption home, as if they had anything to do with it, but when someone is seeing dollar signs in their eyes, my willingness to trust what they say goes down significantly.