Which is about as Scriptural as the Catholic contrivance of the Lord's supper itself.
He must have a picture of Christ placing a wafer of bread on the tongue of the apostles, and maybe even one of the early church only meeting in special church buildings, and with the Lord's supper only being conducted by a unscriptural separate class of sacerdotal priests , offering it as a sacrifice for sins and dispensing it to the people as spiritual food.
They must be pictures for along with other distinctive Catholic teachings that are not manifest in the only wholly inspired substantive authoritative record of what the NT church believed (which is Scripture, in particular Acts through Revelation, which best shows how the NT church understood the gospels), neither are these.
This is to prevent desecration of The Host.
Many opponents of the Church have tried and some succeeded in taking The Host away for purposes more linked to satan and his worship, than the Worship of G_d the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit. This is merely a method to prevent such apostasy.
They have Catholics literally worshipping idols, and sodomy orgies in the Vatican, and cover-ups of horrendous crimes...
...and THIS is what matters?
Seriously?
Sola scriptura is not mentioned in you Bible. Without the Eucharist, which is the Body,Blood,Soul, and Divinity of Christ whose institution is recorded in the New Testament the e would all still be lost.
Your opening statement belies your bias.