Posted on 01/13/2020 7:29:28 AM PST by SeekAndFind
William Tyndale lived over 400 years ago. In his day, the church would allow only its leaders to read and interpret the Bible. It also refused to let the Scriptures be translated from Latin into the language of the people.
God gave Tyndale a deep desire to give the people a Bible they could read for themselves, but he was unable to convince the church to do this work. He therefore began the enormous task of translating the Bible into English himself.
Tyndale worked feverishly from dawn to dusk, six days a week, for 11 years. He taught himself Hebrew in order to translate the Old Testament. All during this time the church opposed his work and even placed a bounty on his head. He finally completed the New Testament in 1525. Since printing had been invented recently, this became the first English New Testament to be printed and distributed widely.
Tragically, in 1536 he was captured and executed before he could finish the Old Testament. Courageous to the end, as he stood before the gallows he prayed, “Lord, open the eyes of the King of England.”
Within three years God answered his prayer, for in 1539 King Henry VIII instructed all publishers to permit “the free and liberal use of the Bible in our native tongue.” And in 1611 the authorized version of King James I was published — the King James Version still in use today.
Here’s the irony: the King James Version is 90 percent the work of William Tyndale. The king’s scholars employed almost entirely Tyndale’s censored work of a century earlier. God used the sacrifice of this man to give us a Bible we can still read and understand today. In fact, the King James Version remains the most popular Bible translation to this day. If you’re like many people, your first copy of God’s Word came mostly from the pen of William Tyndale.
In this article, we will look at the work of modern Tyndales.
These are important questions for all who want to unlock God’s Word for themselves.
The story of the English Bible
The Bible was originally written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Since most people are unfamiliar with these languages, we must rely on a Bible that has been translated into English. For this reason, a good Bible translation is your most essential tool for understanding God’s Word.
Fortunately, there are scores of such translations available today. In fact, the Bible is the most translated book in the world. Where did our English versions of the Bible come from?
Long before Tyndale published his English Bible, scholars were working to give their people a Bible they could read. The first effort of this kind was made by 72 Jewish scholars who translated the Hebrew Old Testament into Greek, the common language of their day. This translation of the Old Testament is called the Septuagint, for the “seventy” who did its work. It is sometimes abbreviated “LXX,” the Roman numeral for seventy. This version was completed by 100 BC.
It is important to know that this Greek Old Testament was the popular Bible of Jesus’ day. When the New Testament writers quoted the Old Testament, they usually quoted the Septuagint. Most versions today still mainly follow its order of the Old Testament books.
One other early translation deserves our attention: the Latin Vulgate. In the fourth century, a scholar in the Catholic Church named Jerome wanted to give the people a Bible in Latin since this had become the common language of the day. So he made this “common” translation. “Vulgate” stands for the “vulgar” or “common” Latin he used. It is ironic that long after Latin passed from the scene as a common language, the church still insisted that this “common” Bible be used. Later, the first attempts to give the Bible in “common” English were based on Jerome’s “common” Bible.
The story of the English Bible begins with the introduction of Christianity into Great Britain, probably around the third century AD. The first British Christians made rough translations of the Bible into the Anglo-Saxon language, completing the Gospels and some of the Old Testament by the ninth century.
Versions of other parts of the Bible were made up to the 14th century. Then John Wycliffe (died 1384) and his followers made the first effort to translate the entire Bible into the people’s language. Wycliffe was a scholar at Oxford. It was his heartfelt belief that the people should have a Bible they could read for themselves. He began this work and his followers completed it. However, the official church rejected his work, and him with it.
In fact, his remains were exhumed after his death and burned along with his books. But Wycliffe’s movement to make the Bible available to everyone could not be stopped. His version, known as the Wycliffe Bible, was the first complete Bible in English. It was translated from poor manuscripts, however, and was never widely available. The work of making a better translation and distributing it effectively was accomplished later by William Tyndale.
In 1535, Miles Coverdale published the first complete printed English Bible. The first English Bible approved by the king was the Matthews Bible in 1537, a version that relied heavily on the Tyndale and Coverdale Bibles. The Taverner Bible of 1539 was the first Bible to be printed completely in England. The Great Bible of 1539 became the first English Bible authorized by the king for use in the churches.
The most notable effort between Tyndale and the King James Bible was the Geneva Bible of 1557. It employed the best scholarship of any English Bible to that point. This Bible was also the first version in English to include verse divisions. It featured maps, tables, chapter summaries, and section titles as well. As a result, the Geneva Bible became the household Bible of English-speaking Protestants. It was the Bible of Shakespeare, John Bunyan, and the pilgrims.
Following the Geneva Bible came the second version authorized by the king for church use: the Bishops Bible of 1568. This became the seventh Bible to appear in Britain in less than five decades.
In the space of 50 years, the English people found themselves with an unfamiliar problem: instead of having no Bible in their language, they had to choose from at least seven different versions!
Which one of these should the church read from in worship? Which was best for personal study? To solve this problem, King James I of England convened a committee of 50 scholars in July 1604. Their charge was to make a new English translation of the Bible from the original languages, giving the people a version everyone could use.
Seven years later they completed their task. The famous King James Version, the most popular English Bible of all time, was the result. From 1611 through the 19th century, this was the Bible of English-speaking Protestants everywhere.
Why are there so many versions of the Bible?
For nearly 300 years, the King James Version held first place in popularity. However, this situation changed greatly in the last century. The movement toward contemporary versions began with the Revised Version in England in 1885 and its American counterpart, the American Standard Version of 1901.
From then to today a host of modern Bible versions have become popular. Leading a Bible study in my first church staff ministry, I happened to use a translation other than the King James. After one session, a deacon stopped me in the hall. “Why aren’t you using the King James?” he demanded. “If it was good enough for Peter and Paul, it’s good enough for you!”
Perhaps he thought Peter and Paul lived to 1611, or perhaps he believed that King James was one of Jesus’ original disciples. However mistaken his knowledge of history, his feelings were real — and popular. Many Christians today want to know why there are so many new versions.
Making new translations of the Bible may seem to be a recent development, but in fact it’s not. Nearly as long as there has been a Bible, there have been changes in manuscript study, scholarship, archaeology, and language. Barely 100 years after the New Testament was written, Origen of Alexandria was devoting years of his life to gathering and studying the versions of the Bible that existed even then. As we have seen, the King James Version is based on other translations and versions of God’s word.
Four factors have contributed to the important role modern translations play in today’s church.
First: New discoveries in biblical manuscripts.
In recent centuries, better manuscripts have been discovered–entire New Testaments 600 years older than those available to the King James translators, as well as fragments that are 900 years older. Old Testament manuscript discoveries have been no less spectacular. The “Dead Sea Scrolls,” Old Testament manuscripts found in 1947 in caves near the Dead Sea, are dated from 100 BC to AD 70, a thousand years older than those available to the King James translators.
Second: Improvements in scholarship.
This work of revision is not new. In fact, the process affected even the King James Version. Not many people know that this version underwent five such revisions. The 1611 version was revised in 1613, with over three hundred changes made from the original edition. Further revisions were made in 1629 and 1638. In 1653, the Parliament passed a bill permitting further revisions when necessary, although nothing more was changed until 1762. In 1769, yet another revision was done, producing the edition of the King James with which we are familiar today.
Third: Findings in archaeology.
The more we learn from papyrus and other ancient documents, the better we can understand the language and literature of the ancient world.
Fourth: Changes in the English language.
For instance, the KJV of Luke 19 says that Zacchaeus could not see Jesus “for the press.”
Modern versions have continually sought to use the latest vocabulary in communicating God’s truth. Thus the New English Bible of 1970 is now the Revised English Bible of 1989. The Revised Standard Version of 1952 is the New Revised Standard Version of 1990. As language changes, so will our translations of God’s unchanging truth. These different versions of the Bible are part of God’s work to get his word to us.
How do I choose a Bible?
Know the different methods of Bible translation.
The literal approach seeks to render the original Greek, Hebrew or Aramaic into English as directly as possible.
This is obviously a valuable way to translate the Scriptures, except that occasionally this approach can miss the meaning of an idiom by rendering it so precisely. If I tell a Cuban congregation that it is “raining cats and dogs outside” and my translator tells them that “cats and dogs are falling out of the sky,” he has rendered my words literally but missed their meaning.
Excellent examples of the literal approach include the New American Standard Bible, the King James Version, and the English Standard Version.
The free approach, by contrast, seeks to translate the ideas of Scripture into English but takes liberties with the literal words as necessary.
Sometimes called a “paraphrase,” this approach is a good way to understand the sense of the Bible but will not always give you the meaning of the words themselves. Good examples include The Message, the Living Bible, and the Phillips translation.
The dynamic equivalence approach takes the middle road, seeking to translate the Bible as literally as possible but rendering idioms into English in a “free” manner when necessary.
The New International Version is the most popular example of this method.
A good approach to biblical translations is to use a version from all three approaches. If you read the New American Standard or English Standard, alongside the NIV and The Message, you would study the Bible with the aid of excellent English translations.
This article was originally published at the Denison Forum.
Catholic bible contains the apocrypha..books even the Jews don’t accept. Even the church admits that it is not inspired texts but historical. The catholic church only added them to after the reformation. They admit there are false teachings in them as well.
Don’t add to the bible
I don’t have an opinion on that. I was simply pointing out your faulty conclusion based on a faulty premise.
I have many Bible translations in my home, but some years ago I bought a Bible with the KJV on the left-hand page and the same text in the New Living Translation on the right-hand page. When I want to read a whole chapter(s) without having to look many things up, this volume satisfies my enjoyment of the beautiful and poetic KJV with an immediate source of clarity via the NLT's contemporary vernacular.
That said, there is even more to understanding the scriptures than being able to understand the language. For that, I have taken courses at churches and with the wonderful organization Community Bilble Studay, which has classes in many parts of the U.S. and abroad.
There were other translations before the Latin Vulgate.
Syrian Peshitta in 2nd Century AD.
Aramaic in 3rd Century, the Latin Vulgate came out also but was not used very much because of the Old Latin Bible.
The Old Latin Bible was in use by 200 AD.
All of these match very highly with the Textus Receptus, which is the primary source text for the KJV.
Good answer
I think a lot of times (not all of the time) but a lot..... when people develop theology by hinging on a word and which translation is accurate..... you know, they may be missing the big picture.
On www.biblegateway.com you can see about 50 English translations of a verse -- look up a verse and at the bottom is a link to "in all English translations".
BLB is good on the iPhone for interlinear and audio of the Greek/Hebrew words. On my laptop, I prefer www.biblehub.com interlinear and commentary.
Thanks.
I like the ESV as well.
Very easy to read but not dumbed down.
It also contains footnotes that make note of different translations of words and other possible meanings, along with notes of where the manuscripts vary. They tend to go with the oldest, most reliable manuscripts, which seems wise to me.
NOT *The Message*.
Nor am I a big fan of The Passion Translation, although a lot of people rave about it.
1. The correct name for the books of the Bible removed by Martin Luther is the deuterocanonical books.
2. The Jews also reject the New Testament books. The Jews do not determine the canon for Christians.
3. The Church recognized the current biblical canon since the fourth century. It was only reaffirmed at the Council of Trent in response to the “Reformers” removing them with no authority to do so.
4. The Church affirms the inspiration of the deuterocanonical books and does not “admit of false teaching in them” because there are none.
See post 24.
I use the Logos software. It is incredibly powerful. Unfortunately it has a steep learning curve but once mastered it’s awesome. It also has a mobile app for most platforms that is quite good.
The Catholic Church as a whole never accepted any formal canon in a full churchwide counsel until the counter-reformation. There we were some regional counsels in the 4th century that accepted the canon previously recognized; as recorded, for example, in Athanasius' 39th Festal letter.
That’s only partially correct. The councils of Carthage and Hippo in the 4th century were regional, but were ratified by Rome. See post 24.
AV1611-period.
+1
Most important: Actually READ it.
Read several versions. Seriously.
Some are more accurate and then others can explain better in ways we understand.
After a while, it gets easy.
I start with KJV but will re-read in the Living Bible, NAS and ESB as well as others at times. Use a concordance!
I am at work, after spending a week in Guatemala participating in a conference teaching a room full of pastors the best ways to preach and present the Gospel.
When I was in charge of the Bible study programs at a Phoenix area homeless men’s shelter I was asked “which Bible should I read?” all the time.
One should remember that there were other dialects of Greek at the time the New Testament was written. Biblical scholars up until the late 1800’s noted that there are words in the New Testament which did not occur elsewhere in Greek literature. They assumed that the dialect of the New Testament was “Holy Spirit Greek” having been inspired by God. Then, the archeologists went to work and located many of these unknown words on street signs and informal letters of the day.
Thus, it turned out that the Greek of the New Testament was the Greek of the common man of the time. It has been known as Koine, or common, Greek ever since. I have heard it referred to as “street Greek”.
Out takeaway should be that God provided his Word in the language of the man on the street so that everyone could understand it. Thus, it behooves us to provide people with Bibles in the pews which are in the common language.
ESV and NASB fit the bill. However, they require a higher reading level than an NIV or even some of the more common paraphrase versions. My favorite paraphrase is the J.B. Phillips New Testament.
My advice to people who ask is always, read the Bible you will read. Choose the best translation, but make it one which you are comfortable reading and, thus, will take the time to open and visit with God on a regular basis! :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.