Posted on 11/24/2019 5:46:58 PM PST by ebb tide
November 24, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) In sending out a tweet about the Gospel reading from Fridays Mass, Fr. James Martin, SJ chose to share a painting drawn from a series of blasphemous homoerotic works depicting the life of Jesus as if he were a gay man.
Gospel: Today Jesus drives the money-changers from the Temple (Lk 19). NT scholars say this was one of the main events that precipitated his execution, tweeted the Jesuit. Yet Jesus is not cowed by opponents. Another Gospel says zeal for his Father's house consumes him.
Gospel: Today Jesus drives the money-changers from the Temple (Lk 19). NT scholars say this was one of the main events that precipitated his execution. Yet Jesus is not cowed by opponents. Another Gospel says "zeal" for his Father's house "consumes him." Also notice that Jesus... pic.twitter.com/MRGpHLBcle
James Martin, SJ (@JamesMartinSJ) November 22, 2019
And Fr. Martin knew exactly what he was doing, because in a later tweet he credited the artist: Image, Douglas Blanchard.
While this painting is jarring because an effeminate Jesus is depicted turning over the money changers tables in a contemporary setting, other paintings in the series show an overtly sexualized version of Jesus in various Gospel stories.
The painting is one of a set of 24 by homosexual artist Douglas Blanchard, used to illustrate a book titled, The Passion of Christ: A Gay Vision.
While the Amazon description of the book is appallingly offensive not just to all Christians, but to the Person of Jesus Christ and God the Father, Fr. Martin nonetheless chose to use one of the Blanchard paintings to illustrate the Gospel.
Amazon describes the book by author Kittredge Cherry and illustrated by Blanchard:
Meet Jesus as a gay man of today in a contemporary city with The Passion of Christ: A Gay Vision. In stunning new images, the modern Christ figure is jeered by fundamentalists, tortured by Marine look-alikes, and rises again to enjoy homoerotic moments with God.
The fundamentalists who jeer Christ are no doubt meant to be those who abide by Church teaching and reject the normalization of homosexuality within the Church.
But far more appalling is the suggestion that Jesus rose again to enjoy homoerotic moments with God, a notion to which Fr. Martin lends tacit approval by drawing from the Blanchard series of paintings. The homoeroticizing of the passion of the Christ is blasphemous.
The Amazon description continues:
The 24 paintings in the gay Passion cover Jesus' final days, including his arrest, trial, crucifixion, and resurrection. A queer Passion is important now because Christianity is being used to justify hate and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. Each image is accompanied by insightful commentary, plus a short prayer and scripture. If Jesus came back today, would he be crucified all over again? Would we even recognize him? See for yourself in the gay vision of the Passion.
The tweet is perhaps an admission by Fr. Martin of his ultimate intent as well as an admission of the anti-Christian and anti-Christ intent underlying the LGBT cultural movement: To co-opt the message of the Gospel, to dethrone Jesus Christ in the hearts and minds of Christians, and to install homosexuality and transgenderism in His place.
Many challenged Fr. Martins tweet.
What would St. Faustina say about this when her own artist couldnt do justice to the image of Jesus? What would our MOTHER say to this depiction of Her precious Son who was beaten mocked starved of water & crucified the most painful death by our sins? asked Lizzy. What does she think of this?
Father, please, you're breaking my heart, pleaded Lizzy in a separate Tweet. Jesus did NOT want to have sex with men. He was ALL GOOD ALL HOLY ALL GOD. He would NEVER approve of this.
Which figure represents Jesus in this picture? The one with oh so cute haircut? asked Eugenio. Have you no sense of reverence for our Precious Lord?
You would be the first one that Our Lord would drive out of His house, asserted T Mac. Promoting immorality isnt exactly pleasing to the Lord.
While all of Blanchards illustrations are disturbing, portraying the main theme of the Gospel message as homoerotic, perhaps the final three paintings in the series are the most troubling.
The Ascension, by Douglas Blanchard passionofchristbook.com
Pentecost, by Douglas Blanchard passionofchristbook.com
In the Ascension, Jesus is shown as a shirtless male in the embrace of a male angel who grasps Jesus buttocks. Same-sex attraction and homosexual sex acts are shown to be the primary purpose of the incarnation, passion, resurrection, and ascension of the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity.
In Blanchards depiction of the Day of Pentecost, The Holy Spirit descends on an urban group in the form of a woman.
Author Kittredge Cherry explains the dark meaning of the final painting, which depicts the Trinity. Cherrys explanation veers far from the immutable Truth about the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. It is a Holy gay wedding.
The Trinity, by Douglas Blanchard passionofchristbook.com
An angelic figure blesses a gay couple in The Trinity, the final, climactic image in Blanchards Passion of Christ. The painting can stand alone to affirm the holiness of gay couples, but it also serves as a meditation on the Christian Trinity.
She continues:
The couple holds hands before a table set with milk, honey, and fruit references to the Promised Land. The man draped in red reaches toward out, coaxing the viewer to join them in the sunny garden. The winged woman in the golden robe is the same Holy Spirit who arrived in the previous painting. An arch in the background hints at the gate of heaven. Indeed viewers are welcome to imagine themselves seated in paradise with Christ as their bridegroom.
The Trinity shows how Jesus has been transformed by his experience of the Passion. He moved from the dark prison of the first painting to a bright land of promise, out of the closet, into the streets, and on to holy bliss. He completed the mythic heros journey: martyred and reborn with power to redeem the world.
Kittredge said the final painting depicts the holy gay wedding.
What is the gay vision of heaven? The Holy Spirit inspires each person to see visions of God in his or her own way. Look, the Holy Spirit celebrates two men who love each other! She looks like an angel as She protects the male couple. Are the men Jesus and God? No names can fully express the omnigendered Trinity of Love, Lover, and Beloved or Mind, Body, and Spirit. God is madly in love with everybody. God promises to lead people out of injustice and into a good land flowing with milk and honey. We can travel in the same paths where Jesus journeyed. Opening to the joy and pain of the world, we can experience all of creation as our body the body of Christ. As queer as it sounds, we can create our own land of milk and honey. As Jesus often said, heaven is among us and within us. Now that we have seen a gay vision of Christs Passion, we are free to move forward with passion.
The LGBT movement is not benign. It is now brazenly revealing itself to be the most grave satanic threat to the Church today, and Fr. James Martin, SJ is leading the coup attempt within the Roman Catholic Church.
Archbishop Chaput of Philadelphia was right to publicly correct Fr. Martin a few weeks ago, and Bishop Strickland of Tyler, Texas has called attention to Martins troubling ministry. Only a few of their brother bishops have rushed to support these brave prelates who sense the danger that Martins actions present to the Church, while the majority remain silent, allowing the Jesuit to carry on with his advocacy unchecked.
There are serious concerns that Pope Francis may consecrate and appoint Fr. James Martin, S.J. as the next bishop of Philadelphia in place of Chaput.
Ping
Seems potentially related.to.the “sexuality is the same as spirituality” assertions
What should happen to him is the same as if he were a Imam in Saudi Arabia. There will hardly be a whisper in the pulpits of America though.
I point them to the almost daily articles you post.
this bishop reminds us of this teaching:
Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves” Matthew 7
Satan has found a willing minion in Fr. Martin !
Thank-you for the referrals.
We are in the days that are as in the days of Lot.
They ate, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they built; but on the day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. Even so will it be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed.Luke 17:28-37.
I am not Catholic, but I was wondering how this guy still functions as a priest. Looks like the powers that be are with him.
Inevitable.
We are in the days that are as in the days of Lot.
“They ate, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they built; but on the day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. Even so will it be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed.”
Luke 17:28-37.
Like when Lot went out of Sodom, so when the church is taken out of the world, fire and brimstone is going to rain on the earth something fierce.
Soon.
I’ve got to call evil evil.
father Martin will get a chance to explain himself to our Father in our Father’s due time. It will not be a happy visit.
and this man is a fully sanctioned priest in the Roman Church committing rank blasphemy. Rome is apostate.
I fear youre correct. Francis taking a picture with Fr. Martin chair to chair in the papal office usually reserved for meetings with heads of state definitely seems like an attempt to raise Martins gravitas/profile/respectability.
The Catholic Church has never embraced homosexuality.
Some protestant churches, however, not only embrace it, they celebrate it.
Nope. Not Rome. Not the Catholic Church.
Bergoglio and James Martin, however, are apostates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.