And he took bread, and gave thanks, and broke it, and gave to them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.
Rememberance != Renewal
Now, if you’d said that the Lord’s Supper is a participation in the one-time sacrifice of Christ, and that we should partake as often as possible, you would have a good argument. But any language that suggests that Jesus is re-sacrificed is anti-Scriptural, and needs to be cautioned against.
This is not a renewal of Christs sacrifice.
Nor is it a new sacrifice.
As Christ said, this is a remembrance.
Why is Protestant pontification on what scripture means any better than Catholic?