Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Heretics Hate Mary and We Should Love Her More
One Peter Five ^ | August 5, 2019 | Timothy Flanders

Posted on 08/07/2019 3:20:08 PM PDT by ebb tide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,041-1,047 next last
To: Al Hitan
Oh, is that why Martin Luther believed in the perpetual virginity of Mary?

Marty was a die hard Catholic, with all its baggage...Some bad habits are hard to break...He never left the Church...The Church left him...

741 posted on 08/10/2019 4:25:51 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
Luther corrected a lot of the errors in the catholic church. He did not get them all.

So, you're saying the Lutheran Confession is in error and shouldn't be referenced? And you agree that the reason Martin Luther believed in the perpetual virginity of the Mother of God was: "Because sex is EEEEEEEEEVIL"?

742 posted on 08/10/2019 4:31:45 PM PDT by Al Hitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan

did I say any such thing? As a life long Lutheran I never heard about the perpetual virginity of Mary until I started talking to catholics. It is not in the catechism and not part of formal Lutheran doctrine. It is not the Lutheran position that sex outside of marriage is eeevil. If you truly want to know more about Lutheran doctrine you can start with the Augsburg confession .


743 posted on 08/10/2019 4:58:19 PM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD; metmom
I would stop feeding the troll.....

Good point.

744 posted on 08/10/2019 5:02:47 PM PDT by Mark17 (Master Sgt, US Air Force, retired. Air traffic controller. Father of US Air Force 2nd Lieutenant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
It is not the Lutheran position that sex outside of marriage is eeevil.

Nice diversion. As you can see if you read the posts, the discussion was not about sex outside of marriage.

If you truly want to know more about Lutheran doctrine you can start with the Augsburg confession .

Thanks. The next time a Lutheran refers us to the Book of Concord, as has happened on FR multiple times, I'll tell them the same and that the Book of Concord is erroneous, as you've pointed out.

745 posted on 08/10/2019 5:06:24 PM PDT by Al Hitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan

The book of Concord was not written by Luther but contains the doctrine of the Lutheran Church. It is not scripture and therefore is not inerrant. Only catholics raise their writings to the level of scripture the rest of us do not. But if you want to know Lutheran doctrine I suggest you start with Luther’s small catechism and the Augsburg confession for basics the. move on to the book of concord if you are still interested. However since you just want to play gotcha it hardly seems to be worth the effort on your part


746 posted on 08/10/2019 5:11:55 PM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan

I know. Sex outside of marriage is sin and therefore evil. Sex inside marriage is a beautiful gift from God. I was pointing out the difference. According to scripture Mary would have been wrong to deny Joseph sex once Christ was born.


747 posted on 08/10/2019 5:14:47 PM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Mom MD
Oh, is that why Martin Luther believed in the perpetual virginity of Mary?

Because he had grown up being indoctrinated by Rome.

God does not correct all ones errors immediately on salvation.

There's growth in the Christian life and learning more about God and the Truth as one spends time in His Word.

As a believer does that, the Holly Spirit will reveal to the believer what HE knows the believer needs to know and deal with in HIS time.

Growth in the Christian walk is a very individual thing and God does not cram us all into a box and make cookie cutter Christians.

748 posted on 08/10/2019 5:35:37 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

To: mostly_lies

The last words Jesus spoke directly to Mary in the Scripture were

“Woman”(not THEOTOKOS) “what is this to you and what to me?”

Not quite so.

John 19:26-27 when Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to her, “Woman, here is your son,” 27 and to the disciple, “Here is your mother.” From that time on, this disciple took her into his home.

we can see very plain that Jesus was her only child.


749 posted on 08/10/2019 5:35:57 PM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: JPII Be Not Afraid

She doesn’t have sin. She seeks a savior because of her humility....................

True.


750 posted on 08/10/2019 5:35:57 PM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan
But wait, he broke his vows, and got married. And had children. So, that doesn't make sense.

Why is that an issue.

The Catholic church had ex-communicated him.

Why would those vows mean anything at that point?

I don't see that anyone needs to be held to vows they make to someone who has sent him packing.

751 posted on 08/10/2019 5:37:10 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

No, the passage at Calvary shows that His brothers and sisters had turned away from Him as He drew the ire of the Sanhedrin. James IS THE brother of Jesus. Is James older or younger than Jesus? When you finish reading the entire Bible, perhaps you will have a different take on this issue.


752 posted on 08/10/2019 5:41:07 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Please stop feeding the troll


753 posted on 08/10/2019 5:41:53 PM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
Sex outside of marriage is sin and therefore evil.

It is not the Lutheran position that sex outside of marriage is eeevil.

You do understand that these two statements of yours, from separate posts, don't agree?

The book of Concord was not written by Luther but contains the doctrine of the Lutheran Church. It is not scripture and therefore is not inerrant.

It is good to know that Lutherans agree your doctrine is in error.

754 posted on 08/10/2019 5:44:47 PM PDT by Al Hitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan

I misposted thank you for correcting my error. it is not the Lutheran position that sex inside marriage is evil

As to your other point as a lifelong Lutheran I have never been taught the perpetual virginity of Mary. It is simply not taught. Every church I have been a member of has acknowledged that Christ has bothers and sisters

There may be errors in Luther’s theology but far less than in catholic theology. Before you break you arm patting yourself on the back Paul said we all see through a glass darkly. Luther got the biggest one right and God used him to reform the church that was in grievous error. Salvation is by grace through faith alone period. No works can add one iota. The solas of the Lutheran reformation stand as a ringing clarion call across the ages to return to Biblical Truth away from the error and heresy of the Roman Church.


755 posted on 08/10/2019 5:55:01 PM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Don’t take the Mark when it is commanded to you, regardless of what signs and lying wonders are accompanying the command.


756 posted on 08/10/2019 5:58:40 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Why weren’t the brothers and sisters of Jesus at the cross? We can only speculate. My speculation, for whatever it is worth. Maybe they didn’t want to see all the blood and gore. I think it’s possible that none of them were true believers yet. At least 2 became believers later, James and Jude, and I hope all of them did. Maybe more likely, Jesus’ brothers and sisters, were afraid the Jewish leaders would have them crucified as well.
We will never know what their thinking was.
757 posted on 08/10/2019 6:05:46 PM PDT by Mark17 (Master Sgt, US Air Force, retired. Air traffic controller. Father of US Air Force 2nd Lieutenant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: metmom

And time has told. I see we have our answer


758 posted on 08/10/2019 6:06:56 PM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

I cannot disagree.


759 posted on 08/10/2019 6:23:49 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 758 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan

As fun as it would be to see how long it’d take you to break down into profanity like the other Roman on the thread, I have better things to do than to play your little gotcha games.


760 posted on 08/10/2019 6:27:41 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,041-1,047 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson