[Steve_Seattle]

Ironically, the people who are now using women as “vessels” - as hired baby machines - are homosexuals.

[Mrs. Don-o]

In fact, the radical anti-binary feminists are the biggest promoters of the depersonalized reproductive technologies (artificial insemination, in-vitro fertilization, surrogacy gestation, etc) which break the natural bonds between man and woman, between father and baby, and between mother and child.

I attended a NOW conference in 1987 -- as a spy --- and recorded a panel discussion in which it was agreed that the breaking of these bonds was not a regrettable side-effect: it was the goal.

Heterosexuals messed this up good, way before the homosexuals got ahold of it.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Incidentally, at that some conference --- 32 years ago --- one woman, a lawyer, conceded that the feminists did not have a coherent philosophy about this, not even a legal philosophy.

For instance, should frozen embryos be handled under Family Law or under Property Law? If you have leftover frozen embryos and the original couple divorces, what do we have on our hands: a custody battle, or a property battle? If they are not our sons and daughters, are they the equivalent of cans of paint left in the back of the garage?

The woman exclaimed in exasperation: "... and the only institution which DOES have a coherent philosophy on this, is the Catholic Church!"

Which is why they are engaged in their ultimate insider-job, the controlled demolition project to take down the Church, --- as we speak.