Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Rurudyne

[[Now if only talking would proceed to serious pushing back on all fronts.]]

It may- just like the constant talking about abortion has resulted in states, years later- banning some forms of abortion

Like you say- if we don’t say anything about the sin of homosexuality- which is exactly what Satan wants- He wants everyone to become so sick of the discussions that they stop even discussing it and just accept it, then We’ve lost the battle-

Satan wants people to say “Meh, it doesn’t affect me, doesn’t hurt me” and ‘what people do in their own private home is none of my business’ but the FACT is- they don’t just do it in their own private home- many homos are predators- and what they do DOES affect others- by the spread of aids, the spread of std’s to people not even associated with them via blood transfusions, dirty needles, unsafe practices etc- by contracting the diseases that require very expensive medical treatment- which of course they go on welfare so the citizens of America are forced to pay for their medical needs-

If we all just shut up about it- Satan wins the battle- which is precisely what He wants=-


48 posted on 05/26/2019 9:50:48 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434

Homosexuals were cultural predators too. They have constantly pushed to remake society and its institutions in the image of their sin till now people who are good people as the PC crowd deems goodness to be are sometimes so stark raving mad that they cannot tell what restroom people should use.

Really, in terms of civilizational warfare that has been driven by the mavens of PC and perversion bears some comparison to that driven by Sharia and Islam. The differences have not to do which the spiritual kingdom behind both but to the nature of the societies that they emerged in.

With Islam, as debased and as violent as pagan culture could get, even the pagans still understood certain aspects of basic morality and so Mohammad created a cult that told them nothing new but gave them a route to exercise their piety, such as it was, and their brutality and cruelty that was endemic of so much of the ancient world in a way that was beneficial to his worldly ambitions, his lust for power and prestige.

With political correctness, on matters well beyond homosexuality, but of course: homosexuality, in the current context these emerged from a culture a world far removed from that which produced Islam. In a culture steeped with Christian and Jewish influences and also with influences of dechristianization and various iterations of socialist thought what emerged was and is a form of militant niceness, the sort of niceness that CS Lewis wrote of when he talked about tyrants whose consciences approved of their tyrannies.

This “niceness” and its attendant tolerance owe everything to the idea, somewhat workable with moral God centered people, of individual autonomy even as it looks to the State to make people nice, to force them to be nice ... and so demands government regulate put near everything that isn’t their grail of “freedom”: what they do with their genitalia. They sold this as the sexual revolution ... but remember what they’ve become, it would never do to just be an amoral revolution.

It has been since day one, since Larry Flynn and the rest, people fighting to have their space for immorality and the cumulative effect could only be that others must not have any space, or any institution, for moral life.

So Islam: a war cult that could only be conventionally so and remains that to this very day, is also a supremacist affair that seeks to make sure no one else has their own space that isn’t Sharia ... and on the other hand there’s the sexual revolution united with basically Cultural Marxism to create a different supremacist affair that seeks to subject all people to the most radical expression of sexual liberation because their morality might someday threaten to get in the way of them getting their jollies or (while we’re at it) having their damnable Revolution.

From without: cruelty that still manages to be sane.

From within: mealy mouthed kindness and tolerance that are stark raving bonkers.

... even to the point of becoming a form of Cultural Suicide Fetish where the latter actively serve the interest of the former.


61 posted on 05/26/2019 11:46:22 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson