the bishops had no institutionalized mechanism for assessing sexual offenses
institutionalized mechanism for assessing sexual offences. One has to think about the words a bit.
Correct problems definition helps solve the problem.
(this is a worldly perspective).
1) if the problem is homos, there are only two ways to prove they are homos: You catch them in the act or they self identify. After that it is accusations, you can’t prove and there will be supporters on both sides of individuals. in essence you repeat the INQUISITION.
2) If the issue is pedophiles, you have much of the same problem.
3) If the issue is corruption, removing a leader isn’t going to do it. The institution is part of the problem.
So what is the solution folks? We all spout off with ideas and various comments. BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF MAN THESE PROBLEMS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN HERE, AND ALWAYS WILL BE HERE ON EARTH.
Now there is a solution, but we aren’t going to like it. It has been implemented multiple times in history. Anyone want to talk about that?
PLEASE put an IMHO by anything you put in ALL CAPS. Thank-you!
“the bishops had no institutionalized mechanism for assessing sexual offenses”
Also, it isn’t their PLACE to have such a mechanism. If you work for Walmart, the managers are not allowed such deference to evaluate it. If an accusation is made, they call the cops who investigate it. If they cover it up, they are charged too.
We do the same thing with universities. Who the hell appointed universities to investigate rape charges instead of calling the police?
If they are aware of a charge, and hide it, they should face the same charge as a conspirator.
And WTH is with this Donohue psycho? He explains that naked fondling, oral sex, porn and all with boys isn’t always “rape”. This sicko needs to STFU.