Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

The way celibacy and virginity is exalted and lauded sends the clear message that sex is wrong and bad.

There was a thread some years back about a Catholic couple who decided to live a celibate marriage, and there were many who thought that was just grand, just like the whole business about Mary’s alleged perpetual virginity.

And in a related article, about women consecrating themselves to perpetual virginity, someone posted a comment about her then being kept *pure* as if if she had married and not had sex, she would have been impure.

The sex is bad thinking is an underlying message in many ways in Catholicism.


136 posted on 07/08/2018 11:04:04 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; Mrs. Don-o

On the other hand, denigration of virginity as a choice could give the idea that a woman has no value unless she’s being used for genital gratification by a man.


138 posted on 07/08/2018 11:35:28 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Fill in my standard rant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
"The way celibacy and virginity is exalted and lauded sends the clear message that sex is wrong and bad."

There was no such message.

It's remarkable how you've managed to block out everything about sacramentality -- which you presumably just read in #118, which you are ostensibly responding to ---in order to write such an oblivious, blinkered statement.

"And in a related article, about women consecrating themselves to perpetual virginity, someone posted a comment about her then being kept *pure* as if if she had married and not had sex, she would have been impure."

You added your own conclusion. It's apparent that you reach these conclusions by ignoring what people actually say, and then responding to what you yourself have unrecognizably "reinterpreted" their message to be.

It's much like your reproach for a man who would "leave a wife behind and abandon her to fend for herself" ---

Except, nobody had said that: it was your own assumption. You just put it out there, and then you react as if somebody (other than yourself) were proposing such a thing.

(((Shakes head.)))

Good Lord, I'm being Cathy Newman'ed.


139 posted on 07/08/2018 11:36:55 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("So, what you're saying is....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

141 posted on 07/08/2018 11:40:37 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("So, what you're saying is....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

142 posted on 07/08/2018 11:42:00 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("So, what you're saying is....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

143 posted on 07/08/2018 11:43:29 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("So, what you're saying is....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson