Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry; Faith Presses On; Fantasywriter; metmom

Scripture was defined and compiled via tradition.

Christ never told his disciples to write anything, he told them to preach.

***

Now that’s funny.

The word ‘canon’ comes from a measure, or a rule with which to measure against something else.

If you say that Scripture was compiled according to ‘tradition,’ that means that they only put things into it that matched what they had been taught: IE, canon.

And now you’re getting upset at us that we’re using this measure to test Rome’s theology, and Rome’s theology is coming up so painfully short that you have to argue AGAINST the Scripture that YOU claimed that they assembled.


175 posted on 06/08/2018 4:49:46 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Luircin
And now you’re getting upset at us that we’re using this measure to test Rome’s theology, and Rome’s theology is coming up so painfully short that you have to argue AGAINST the Scripture that YOU claimed that they assembled.

You have to see it to believe it, don't you?

176 posted on 06/08/2018 4:54:14 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: Luircin

Very good points. Here’s another. The believers knew from the time they received the letters which ones were from Paul, which from Peter, which from John, etc. The Councils did not *establish* which letters and Gospels were authentic. Rather, they codified/officialized what was *already* known and accepted among the believers.

Now iirc, there was a genuine debate re James. However, the Holy Spirit oversaw that debate and ensured that it concluded with the right decision.

My Church History class was a long time ago. :)


179 posted on 06/08/2018 5:08:38 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: Luircin; Salvation; G Larry; metmom; aMorePerfectUnion; boatbums; Mom MD
If you say that Scripture was compiled according to ‘tradition,’ that means that they only put things into it that matched what they had been taught: IE, canon.

And now you’re getting upset at us that we’re using this measure to test Rome’s theology, and Rome’s theology is coming up so painfully short that you have to argue AGAINST the Scripture that YOU claimed that they assembled.

Of all the things I've seen that rile up the Roman Catholics the most is when their false doctrines are compared to Scripture.

The one that really stirs the pot is the Immaculate Conception.

Indeed....Rome's own Catholic Encyclopedia online admits: No direct or categorical and stringent proof of the dogma can be brought forward from Scripture.

Rome claims their doctrines/"traditions" are derived from Scripture....yet this dogma, which RCs have to believe, is admitted not to be found in Scripture.

But Rome cannot back down and admit their error on this. If they did, it would practically destroy the Roman Catholic church as it has invested so heavily in the worship of Mary.

206 posted on 06/08/2018 8:00:29 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: Luircin

Very true. That’s a good point.


297 posted on 06/09/2018 7:23:30 AM PDT by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson