[ravenwolf]

Yet, you went ahead and tried to explain the verse and attempted to use a backhanded insult in the process....but I bet you are aware of that.
———————————————————————————————No, that is false i just noted the father because it is in the scripture.

“However, it still does not say what you want it to say. No where does Paul extol the Corinthians, or anyone else for that matter, to refer to him as Father Paul.”

That is false.

“A literal rendering would be: I you have begotten.”

That is also false.

” No reference to being Father Paul.”

Another false statement.

You really need to just believe the scriptures rather than try to rewrite them, you are not that good at it.

[ealgeone]

>>“A literal rendering would be: I you have begotten.”<<

That is also false.

Ok, junior.....you're out of your league here.

No run along and play somewhere else.

[ealgeone]

I also believe Paul words gets twisted so much that it is really hard for any one to agree with just what it was that he said, not ignoring the fact that he did a lot of that himself.

This post of yours tells me pretty much all I need to know about your theological perspective.

You're saying the Holy Spirit messed things up when He was moving Paul to write his letters.

Got it.