“you need to think a little more deeply and encompass other parts of Paul’s Epistles”
—
I know I’m certainly open to seeing where Paul disowns or refutes any part of the book of Romans.
“before drawing conclusions.”
—
The only conclusion I’ve drawn here is that Paul did have the office of deaconess to write about in his day and I even cited one by her by name, giving a specific bible passage for a source. So it’s more of an objectively observable fact than a conclusion. I merely pointed out the fact.
If you can cite any other conclusion I offered, I’m also open to reading that.
And I am just pointing out that just because something is referred to once needs to be taken into context of other letters and the Bible at large.
You appear to be trying to mislead readers with incomplete information. Just counteracting that.
I know about certain evangelists who cherry pick Scripture to lead their ‘flock’ astray. Hope you are not one of them.