This silly article reminds me of the mental gymnastics required to decipher the Church's absurd "epicycles" to fill the gaps (eg. Mars' retrograde motion) in Ptolemy's false geocentric theory.
The Churchs epicycles? Can you support your contention that the Church invented epicycles?
In fact Copernicus relied even more heavily on epicycles than did Ptolemy, to square his Aristotelian assumption of circular orbits with actual observations of elliptical orbits. Epicycles were only solved by Keplers theory of elliptical orbits.
The Church has pretty much nothing to do with the transition from Copernicus to Kepler.