Very little more obnoxiously evangelical than an ex-Christian.
Thanks once against for proving Scripture correct:
“For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt. 7For land that has drunk the rain that often falls on it, and produces a crop useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God. 8But if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed, and its end is to be burned.”
Considering that your version of chrstianity is a fifteen hundred year later reconstruction of something that never existed, and that during those fifteen hundred years actual historical chrstians were living as monks and hermits and performing post-Biblical chrstian rituals (and living in a constant fear of dying and going to hell despite being chrstians), you're not really the best apologist for the religion.
Thanks once against for proving Scripture correct:
“For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt. 7For land that has drunk the rain that often falls on it, and produces a crop useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God. 8But if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed, and its end is to be burned.”
Chrstianity is like evolution; everything "proves it." So you're not saying much. Also, considering you think that the "new testament's" interpretation of the Hebrew Bible is "self-evidently true," your threshold for "proof" is, again, very low.