There are many who want to claim Christ was married because they think this is a way to mock Christians. I’m not saying that this strategy is rational, only that it is a common motive.
I’ll go further and state this is a dishonest and shameful motive.
Ultimately, reasonable minds necessarily agree that what’s false should be discarded and what’s true should be kept.
How is saying that Christ may have been married a way of mocking Christians? I’m guessing that a certain group of Christians that are invested in priests not being able to marry (after hundreds of years of being able to marry) are deeply invested in Christ never being married.
I still say it makes no difference.