I’m at lunch and getting only segments at a time. But this guy is not a nut job. Neither is he trying to work up that black audience with “amens” or “halleleujahs.” Very low key which might slightly bore his immediate audience but lends it a bit more veracity to me.
He’s not untrained on the use of the Word. As a matter of fact, his twice use of Ecclesiastes blew me away. Very few can refer to this book and get as much as he did from it. His teaching on other Scriptures (up thru 20 minutes) is better than 95% of what we get from the pulpit today.
I may regret to somewhat endorsing this when I get towards the end of his presentation and something outlandish is said by him. But — at this point — I’m surprised at how much credence I’m giving it now.
On another matter, anticipate huge blow-back when you put something which mockers and scoffers can grab onto. Just a reminder to be wary that we never give our pearls to swine, divine viewpoint to those who embrace human viewpoint. In this case there’s at least one believer who appreciates what you’ve posted.
You are correct about pearls before swine...
Also shaking the dust off from people who will not hear you.
But this is FR, and there is an assumption of a shared Judeo Christianity; all this does is go the distance.
I listened through the longer sermon of this same guy that I linked to; pretty much spot on with the Word, which as you know is the true test of his veracity.