[ravenwolf]

It’s noted you did not respond at all to post 1259 with the same thoughtful civility in which the post was addressed to you.

---

Because it is not the idea of the person who wrote the comment but is all from a link bashing the catholic church in general.

My mind is not strong enough and i also am not inclined to try to answer a dozen questions in two minutes that it may have taken the writer a month to sort out.

Also before i could answer them i would first have to study the Catholic doctrine to assure myself that the questions were on the level.

I usually do not go to links, in this case i made an exception.

[Resettozero]

Because it is not the idea of the person who wrote the comment but is all from a link bashing the catholic church in general.

No it wasn't. The article at the link points out errors in theology by anyone claiming to believe the Bible as authoritative; namely, errors that are in disagreement with what is written in the Old and New Testaments. These could be errors that still may be taught by many Christian sects, one of which probably is Roman Catholicism as explained by you and others on this forum.