Which is simply another example of your own duplicity. You profess to be against the condemnation of any believer in Jesus Christ while condemning believers in Jesus Christ as modern day Pharisees who do as you did , accusing another of posting falsehood, though it was not , then censoring those who reprove Catholic Mariolatry, and even telling them "if you don’t agree with Catholicism then stay away from Catholicism," while justifying your accusations of what you allege are blatant fallacies. And then, after all your double standard accusations and evasion, you liken me to a fly who plays an "defective uncharitable game."
It is thus clear that, like a liberal and typical Catholic defender. you give yourself the freedom to make accusations but censor those who expose them as false, and as a last resort, engage in ad hominem in lieu of an actual argument.
“You profess to be against the condemnation of any believer in Jesus Christ”
I am.
“While condemning believers in Jesus Christ as modern day Pharisees”
I did no such thing. I was speaking specifically about these “open religion” threads.
“It is thus clear that, like a liberal”
Fallacy of false knowledge. If you knew anything about me, which you don’t, you’d know that I’m many things but a being a liberal isn’t one of them.
“and typical Catholic defender.”
Ah, do tell. Please elaborate at length what a “typical Catholic defender” is. I enjoy reading a good stereotypical comedy. :)
Wishing you & yours a blessed day, every day.