Posted on 07/17/2017 8:08:32 AM PDT by ebb tide
“Francis is more interested in leftwing politics than in Catholic theology”, George Neumayr, contributing editor of The American Spectator, states talking to Tom Woods on July 14th on tomwoods.com. Woods describes Francis as a result of John Paul II who - as he puts it - appointed "absolutely terrible people" as bishops: "Catholics have suffered under Bergoglios for decades now”.
Neumayr agrees that a lot of the liberal bishops were appointed by John Paul II and Benedict XVI. He sees Francis as the “culmination of a century” of liberalism and modernism in the Church.
For him it is "highly unlikely" that Francis, who in his theology is “more a Protestant than a Catholic” will convert to Catholicism. Instead, the realistic scenario is that Francis will produce division and chaos, "Catholics will have to decide whether they guard the faith over papolatry.”
And: “The Cardinals have to declare that Francis is a bad pope who must be resisted.”
.
Do you ever post anything but falsehood?
You continually attack those that present the pure word and accuse the word of Yehova to be the dictates of a cult.
You must overcome your obvious hatred of Yehova’s commandments to have any hope of achieving a beginning level of understanding.
One must not go to the grave clinging to the “inherited lies wherein there is no profit.”
.
I posted what you said and what is true of Rood.
Unfortunately, you seem to revert to personal attacks, which convince no one.
The rest of your post is the teaching of good ol’ Rood, a former false teacher with the Way cult, who now runs his own deal, so not a credible source of truth.
.
You posted absolutely nothing that is true.
.
The beard is a nice touch too!
Yeah, about that.
I will continue to point out what you teach and the false teacher you claim to follow.
As a teacher in the Way cult Rood taught the heresies of the group. He continues in disguise now - beard and all.
Whom do you believe your false personal attacks convince of anything worthy of belief?
Your angry bitter hatred directed toward a Godly teacher that hasn't ever posted anything here leaves a foul oder in your posts.
.
“directed toward a Godly teacher”
The Way International cult where Rood served as a teacher collapsed and he left and started the #fakerabbi gig.
sure e-s!
If what you post is a reflection of what Rood teaches, I would have to disagree with your claim.
Good night e-s.
.
The response of a bitter hardened heart.
.
And if I characterized the Protestants in such a manner, would you think I was being rude?
Whom do you follow? Luther, who continually changed his mind, recommending massacre of the peasants, everything Hitler did against the Jews short of the concentration camp, and assuring Phillip of Hesse that bigamy was a-ok?
So he starts a church of sorts, based on *his* interpretation of the Bible, and when someone disagrees with Luther’s interpretation, he starts his own church, all the while burning witches, destroying property that doesn’t belong to them, fomenting war and rebellion, and starting new churches each time someone disagrees with his minister’s interpretation, until there are dozens of “Christian” churches unified only in their hatred of the original Church founded not by Wesley or Smyth or Darby or Eddy, but by Jesus Christ Himself.
I think you think I would be very rude if I spoke like that about Protestantism, but you go ahead and feel free to insult those whom you are presumably trying to persuade. Good luck with that tactic. I myself am outta here.
Chicory, you seem relatively new to the Religion Forum.
I suggest you carefully read the rules on the home page of the Religion Moderator.
Second, grow a thicker skin or switch to the caucus threads as the Religion Moderator suggests.
As to whom I follow? It is a Whom - Christ.
Best
Thanks bro! Only God can open eyes. We are commanded to oppose and expose false teachers like Rood.
Who is the Religion Forum moderator? I want to read the rules before asking if you think I am breaking a rule and you did not.
My skin is fine. Yours is the one that seems thin. Don’t like it when the tables are turned?
You follow what some person other than Christ figures out the Bible means. No private interpretation, the Bible says. How can I understand, when there is no one to explain, the Bible says. But where is Sola Scriptura in the Bible? What does the Bible say is the pillar and ground of truth? To whom does Christ give the authority to teach?
Think on those questions, don’t answer them here....
Isn't this the word:
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith (Eph. 2:8)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.