If Luther thought indulgences as practiced in his lifetime were Church teaching, he did not understand the teaching.
As practiced, they were against the teaching.
Purgatory has Scriptural and Traditional and logical bases.
“Purgatory has Scriptural and Traditional and logical bases.”
It has none of these in Christianity.
It does have a pagan traditional background.
Argue your beliefs from Scripture.
Luther did.
The fact that you continue to refuse to do so says a lot more about you than it does about anyone else.
The scripture passages claimed by your Org do not teach what your Org tries to claim with them.
Your Traditions are the fabrications of men seeking to strengthen your Org, not the Gospel message.
The 'logic' of your purported Purgatory is demonic in origin since it openly denies that the Crucifixion and our faith in His Sacrifice for us is insufficient to transform us to the righteousness of Christ in the spiritual plane.
I would go so far as to accuse Catholicism of blatant heretical teaching, serving not the Gospel of Grace but satan's gospel of 'works to earn'.
If you wish to refute my accusation, post Scriptures which plainly do so. I'll wait ...
Luther "thought"??? Correction... Luther KNEW that what was practiced was permitted within the teachings of the Catholic church and approved by the Pope, who took full advantage of the massive amount of money pouring into the Vatican to fund St. Peter's Basilica. Will you also accuse Pope Leo X of permitting things that were against church teaching?
Pope Leo X:
Purgatory has Scriptural and Traditional and logical bases.[sic]
Actually, Purgatory has only a semblance of a Scriptural basis - one that is NOT explicitly found in any of the supposed passages trotted forth to support it and actually DISPROVED by actual ones. It also is not logical and the only "traditional" support is from later musings of those who failed to understand the truth of the gospel of grace.