To: editor-surveyor
That’s a lot to assert with no supporting documentation.
256 posted on
07/03/2017 5:05:57 PM PDT by
papertyger
(The semantics define how we think.)
To: papertyger
.
The Book of Matthew is not documentation?
Your vacuous denial is comical.
You could try actually reading it.
.
257 posted on
07/03/2017 5:11:48 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: papertyger
.
Pardon me, I thought you were responding to a different post.
Try reading the Acts. Is there anything in it that is not Torah?
.
259 posted on
07/03/2017 5:14:43 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson