(1) I was not responding to the article "as a whole". I was responding to your personal view, quoted at the top:
"It's a sin for a Catholic to worship alongside heretics."
So I was asking for a clarification of your personal view, as applied to canonically permitted mixed marriages.
(2)You ask, "why [are] you are defending ecumenical “masses”?
I did not defend ecumenical masses.
48 posted on
06/23/2017 12:32:51 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(He that falls into sin, is a man; he that grieves it, is a saint; he that boasts of it, is a devil.)
(1) I was not responding to the article "as a whole". I was responding to your personal view, quoted at the top: "It's a sin for a Catholic to worship alongside heretics". Perhaps in rash judgement, you missed the "s" in "heretics"?
I was never referring to mixed marrriages.