YOU are the one making the claim that nothing after Deuteronomy 4:2 is relevant.
Why are you demanding that he prove your point to you?
Do your own work.
Don't be an idiot. I asked a simple question. If "Add Nothing to this Book" in Revelations is accurate, WHY can Deut "Add Nothing" be ignored? You can't have have it both ways.
Clearly shows your interpenetration of Scripture is wrong, and cannot be supported by Scripture. I cannot defend or explain Sola Scripture because it is NOWHERE supported in Scripture.
Show from Scripture why Deut can be ignored.