You know?
After your accusations, I did some research.
(Though let’s be honest. Not presenting proof of your arguments is pretty lame.)
And while I don’t believe you for a second, I will say that yes, Jesus spoke Aramiac. That doesn’t, however, mean that none of them spoke Koine. Considering how John and Matthew were distributed in Koine, with a distinct lack of Aramaic Gospels, I find it hard to believe that they’re ignorant like that.
And no, I still don’t believe you. You have not presented proof that what you claimed was the original word was actually spoken; all you have offered was an assumption that fits your narrative.
On top of that, you have not offered any additional arguments to support your claim about Peter having church authority, only one passage that could be interpreted multiple ways.
And considering the fact that the church was spread on the confession that Jesus is the Christ, not that Peter was the leader of some new religion, suggests that the ‘rock’ was ‘you are the Christ.’
No dice, sir. No dice.
By the way, have you considered my accusations against Roman theology and how it blasphemes the Word of God?
What were Christ's last words on the cross? Greek or Aramaic?