Same proposition, 2 different examples, included subject that you 1st introduced, initial argument still not satisfied, clearly showing your misapplication of ‘moving the goalposts’.
Goal is still the same - you need to show how sunlight is increasing order on Earth. But please don’t bother responding as you have already completed many circuits of you circular logic.
“Same proposition, 2 different examples”
Incorrect. Your first proposition was: “For all intents and purposes the Earth IS considered a closed system.” Your second proposition was: “the Earth and Sun are and will continue to both completely devolve rather than the Sun turning our Earth into a more highly ordered planet.” The first proposition excludes any consideration of the sun, since you claimed the earth was a “closed system”. The second proposition now suddenly includes the sun. They cannot be the same proposition.
“But please don’t bother responding...”
Classic tactic of someone who knows they are losing an argument but is too proud to admit it. Sorry, but if you want to keep responding to me with nonsense, I am going to continue to point it out. Maybe quit while you are behind.